Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24489965›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Neuro-anatomical evidence indicating indirect modulation of macrophages by vagal efferents in the intestine but not in the spleen.

Cathy Cailotto, Pedro J Gomez-Pinilla, Léa M Costes, Jan van der Vliet, Martina Di Giovangiulio, Andrea Némethova, Gianluca Matteoli, Guy E Boeckxstaens

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 73 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
73citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

73 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 117 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Transcutaneous Vagal Nerve Stimulation for Gastrointestinal Disorders.Journal of translational gastroenterology · 2025
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

13 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Cathy CailottoTytgat Institute for Liver and Intestinal Research, Academic Medical Center (AMC), Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Pedro J Gomez-PinillaDepartment of Gastroenterology, University Hospital Leuven, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Léa M CostesTytgat Institute for Liver and Intestinal Research, Academic Medical Center (AMC), Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jan van der VlietTytgat Institute for Liver and Intestinal Research, Academic Medical Center (AMC), Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Martina Di GiovangiulioDepartment of Gastroenterology, University Hospital Leuven, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Andrea NémethovaDepartment of Gastroenterology, University Hospital Leuven, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Gianluca MatteoliDepartment of Gastroenterology, University Hospital Leuven, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Guy E BoeckxstaensDepartment of Gastroenterology, University Hospital Leuven, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
KU Leuven · BEAcademic Medical Center · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundElectrical stimulation of the vagus nerve suppresses intestinal inflammation and normalizes gut motility in a mouse model of postoperative ileus. The exact anatomical interaction between the vagus nerve and the intestinal immune system remains however a matter of debate. In the present study, we provide additional evidence on the direct and indirect vagal innervation of the spleen and analyzed the anatomical evidence for neuroimmune modulation of macrophages by vagal preganglionic and enteric postganglionic nerve fibers within the intestine.

methodsDextran conjugates were used to label vagal preganglionic (motor) fibers projecting to the small intestine and spleen. Moreover, identification of the neurochemical phenotype of the vagal efferent fibers and enteric neurons was performed by immunofluorescent labeling. F4/80 antibody was used to label resident macrophages.

resultsOur anterograde tracing experiments did not reveal dextran-labeled vagal fibers or terminals in the mesenteric ganglion or spleen. Vagal efferent fibers were confined within the myenteric plexus region of the small intestine and mainly endings around nNOS, VIP and ChAT positive enteric neurons. nNOS, VIP and ChAT positive fibers were found in close proximity of intestinal resident macrophages carrying α7 nicotinic receptors. Of note, VIP receptors were found on resident macrophages located in close proximity of VIP positive nerve fibers.

conclusionIn the present study, we show that the vagus nerve does not directly interact with resident macrophages in the gut or spleen. Instead, the vagus nerve preferentially interacts with nNOS, VIP and ChAT enteric neurons located within the gut muscularis with nerve endings in close proximity of the resident macrophages.

Indexed as

Acetylcholinealpha7 Nicotinic Acetylcholine ReceptorAnimalsEfferent PathwaysFemaleIntestine, SmallLymph NodesMacrophagesMiceMice, Inbred BALB CMyenteric PlexusNeckNerve Growth FactorsNitric Oxide Synthase Type ISpleenVagus NerveAcetylcholinealpha7 Nicotinic Acetylcholine ReceptorCAT development factorNerve Growth FactorsNitric Oxide Synthase Type INos1 protein, mouse

Identifiers

PMID24489965
PMCPMC3906221
OpenAlexW1986367298

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.