Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24489843›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Architectural design drives the biogeography of indoor bacterial communities.

Steven W Kembel, James F Meadow, Timothy K O'Connor, Gwynne Mhuireach, Dale Northcutt, Jeff Kline, Maxwell Moriyama, G Z Brown, Brendan J M Bohannan, Jessica L Green

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 96 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
96citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
17.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

96 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 250 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The potential importance of the built-environment microbiome and its impact on human health.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  17. Surveillance of Bacterial Load and Multidrug-Resistant Bacteria on Surfaces of Public Restrooms.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

36 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Steven W KembelDépartement des sciences biologiques, Université du Québec à Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada ; Biology and the Built Environment Center, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon, United States of America ; Institute of Ecology and Evolution, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon, United States of America.
James F MeadowBiology and the Built Environment Center, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon, United States of America ; Institute of Ecology and Evolution, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon, United States of America.
Timothy K O'ConnorBiology and the Built Environment Center, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon, United States of America ; Institute of Ecology and Evolution, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon, United States of America ; Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, United States of America.
Gwynne MhuireachBiology and the Built Environment Center, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon, United States of America ; Energy Studies in Buildings Laboratory, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon, United States of America.
Dale NorthcuttBiology and the Built Environment Center, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon, United States of America ; Energy Studies in Buildings Laboratory, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon, United States of America.
Jeff KlineBiology and the Built Environment Center, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon, United States of America ; Energy Studies in Buildings Laboratory, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon, United States of America.
Maxwell MoriyamaBiology and the Built Environment Center, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon, United States of America ; Energy Studies in Buildings Laboratory, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon, United States of America.
G Z BrownBiology and the Built Environment Center, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon, United States of America ; Energy Studies in Buildings Laboratory, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon, United States of America ; Department of Architecture, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon, United States of America.
Brendan J M BohannanBiology and the Built Environment Center, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon, United States of America ; Institute of Ecology and Evolution, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon, United States of America.
Jessica L GreenBiology and the Built Environment Center, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon, United States of America ; Institute of Ecology and Evolution, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon, United States of America ; Santa Fe Institute, Santa Fe, New Mexico, United States of America.
University of Oregon · USSanta Fe Institute · USUniversity of Arizona · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundArchitectural design has the potential to influence the microbiology of the built environment, with implications for human health and well-being, but the impact of design on the microbial biogeography of buildings remains poorly understood. In this study we combined microbiological data with information on the function, form, and organization of spaces from a classroom and office building to understand how design choices influence the biogeography of the built environment microbiome.

resultsSequencing of the bacterial 16S gene from dust samples revealed that indoor bacterial communities were extremely diverse, containing more than 32,750 OTUs (operational taxonomic units, 97% sequence similarity cutoff), but most communities were dominated by Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, and Deinococci. Architectural design characteristics related to space type, building arrangement, human use and movement, and ventilation source had a large influence on the structure of bacterial communities. Restrooms contained bacterial communities that were highly distinct from all other rooms, and spaces with high human occupant diversity and a high degree of connectedness to other spaces via ventilation or human movement contained a distinct set of bacterial taxa when compared to spaces with low occupant diversity and low connectedness. Within offices, the source of ventilation air had the greatest effect on bacterial community structure.

conclusionsOur study indicates that humans have a guiding impact on the microbial biodiversity in buildings, both indirectly through the effects of architectural design on microbial community structure, and more directly through the effects of human occupancy and use patterns on the microbes found in different spaces and space types. The impact of design decisions in structuring the indoor microbiome offers the possibility to use ecological knowledge to shape our buildings in a way that will select for an indoor microbiome that promotes our health and well-being.

Indexed as

Environmental MicrobiologyDeinococcusDustEnvironment DesignMicrobiotaMolecular TypingPhylogenyProteobacteriaRNA, BacterialRNA, Ribosomal, 16SUniversitiesVentilationDustRNA, BacterialRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID24489843
PMCPMC3906134
OpenAlexW2017742749

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.