Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24489837›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Loss of connectivity in cancer co-expression networks.

Roberto Anglani, Teresa M Creanza, Vania C Liuzzi, Ada Piepoli, Anna Panza, Angelo Andriulli, Nicola Ancona

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Structure learning for gene regulatory networks.PLoS computational biology · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Network Analysis of Microarray Data.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Applying graph database technology for analyzing perturbed co-expression networks in cancer.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2020
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Roberto AnglaniInstitute of Intelligent Systems for Automation, National Research Council, CNR-ISSIA, Bari, Italy.
Teresa M CreanzaInstitute of Intelligent Systems for Automation, National Research Council, CNR-ISSIA, Bari, Italy ; Center for Complex Systems in Molecular Biology and Medicine, University of Torino, Torino, Italy.
Vania C LiuzziInstitute of Intelligent Systems for Automation, National Research Council, CNR-ISSIA, Bari, Italy.
Ada PiepoliDepartment of Medical Sciences, Division and Laboratory of Gastroenterology, IRCCS Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza, San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy.
Anna PanzaDepartment of Medical Sciences, Division and Laboratory of Gastroenterology, IRCCS Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza, San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy.
Angelo AndriulliDepartment of Medical Sciences, Division and Laboratory of Gastroenterology, IRCCS Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza, San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy.
Nicola AnconaInstitute of Intelligent Systems for Automation, National Research Council, CNR-ISSIA, Bari, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Differential gene expression profiling studies have lead to the identification of several disease biomarkers. However, the oncogenic alterations in coding regions can modify the gene functions without affecting their own expression profiles. Moreover, post-translational modifications can modify the activity of the coded protein without altering the expression levels of the coding gene, but eliciting variations to the expression levels of the regulated genes. These considerations motivate the study of the rewiring of networks co-expressed genes as a consequence of the aforementioned alterations in order to complement the informative content of differential expression. We analyzed 339 mRNAomes of five distinct cancer types to find single genes that presented co-expression patterns strongly differentiated between normal and tumor phenotypes. Our analysis of differentially connected genes indicates the loss of connectivity as a common topological trait of cancer networks, and unveils novel candidate cancer genes. Moreover, our integrated approach that combines the differential expression together with the differential connectivity improves the classic enrichment pathway analysis providing novel insights on putative cancer gene biosystems not still fully investigated.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGene Regulatory NetworksBiomarkers, TumorGene Expression ProfilingGenes, NeoplasmHumansNeoplasmsSignal TransductionBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID24489837
PMCPMC3904972

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.