ArticlePloS one2014
Circulating tumor cells: clinically relevant molecular access based on a novel CTC flow cell.
Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
47 citing papers in PubMed.
- Chemical and Technological Aspects of Magnetic Particles for Cancer Liquid Biopsy Applications.ChemistryOpen · 2026Review
- PD-L1 status on circulating tumor cells: a promising predictor in advanced lung cancer with PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapies.European journal of medical research · 2026Article
- Translating Liquid Biopsy into Practice- The Promise and Challenges of Circulating Tumor Cells in Ovarian and Lung Cancer Management.Biomarker insights · 2026Review
- The integrated on-chip isolation and detection of circulating tumour cells.Sensors & diagnostics · 2024Review
- Recent advances in photothermal nanomaterials-mediated detection of circulating tumor cells.RSC advances · 2024Review
- Targeting circulating tumor cells to prevent metastases.Human cell · 2024Review
- Zwitterionic microgel preservation platform for circulating tumor cells in whole blood specimen.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Microfluidics engineering towards personalized oncology-a review.In vitro models · 2023Review
- Biomarkers of gastric cancer: current advancement.Heliyon · 2022Review
- Review
- Circulating tumor cells and cell-free tumor DNA analyses in urothelial cancer using the LiquidBiopsy platform.Current urology · 2022Article
- Multi-Modal Microfluidics (MMicromachines · 2022Article
- Breast cancer circulating tumor cells with mesenchymal features-an unreachable target?Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2022Review
- Relevance of Circulating Tumor Cells as Predictive Markers for Cancer Incidence and Relapse.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Liquid Biopsy-Based Biosensors for MRD Detection and Treatment Monitoring in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC).Biosensors · 2021Review
- Early Diagnosis and Screening for Lung Cancer.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2021Review
- Cell-Main Spectra Profile Screening Technique in Simulation of Circulating Tumour Cells Using MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry.Cancers · 2021Article
- Circulating Tumor Cells from Enumeration to Analysis: Current Challenges and Future Opportunities.Cancers · 2021Review
- Breast tumor-on-chip models: From disease modeling to personalized drug screening.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2021Review
- Effect of Varying Expression of EpCAM on the Efficiency of CTCs Detection by SERS-Based Immunomagnetic Optofluidic Device.Cancers · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundContemporary cancer diagnostics are becoming increasing reliant upon sophisticated new molecular methods for analyzing genetic information. Limiting the scope of these new technologies is the lack of adequate solid tumor tissue samples. Patients may present with tumors that are not accessible to biopsy or adequate for longitudinal monitoring. One attractive alternate source is cancer cells in the peripheral blood. These rare circulating tumor cells (CTC) require enrichment and isolation before molecular analysis can be performed. Current CTC platforms lack either the throughput or reliability to use in a clinical setting or they provide CTC samples at purities that restrict molecular access by limiting the molecular tools available. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL
findingsRecent advances in magetophoresis and microfluidics have been employed to produce an automated platform called LiquidBiopsy®. This platform uses high throughput sheath flow microfluidics for the positive selection of CTC populations. Furthermore the platform quantitatively isolates cells useful for molecular methods such as detection of mutations. CTC recovery was characterized and validated with an accuracy (<20% error) and a precision (CV<25%) down to at least 9 CTC/ml. Using anti-EpCAM antibodies as the capture agent, the platform recovers 78% of MCF7 cells within the linear range. Non specific recovery of background cells is independent of target cell density and averages 55 cells/mL. 10% purity can be achieved with as low as 6 CTCs/mL and better than 1% purity can be achieved with 1 CTC/mL. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: The LiquidBiopsy platform is an automated validated platform that provides high throughput molecular access to the CTC population. It can be validated and integrated into the lab flow enabling CTC enumeration as well as recovery of consistently high purity samples for molecular analysis such as quantitative PCR and Next Generation Sequencing. This tool opens the way for clinically relevant genetic profiling of CTCs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.