Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24489757›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Ultrasound molecular imaging of secreted frizzled related protein-2 expression in murine angiosarcoma.

James K Tsuruta, Nancy Klauber-DeMore, Jason Streeter, Jennifer Samples, Cam Patterson, Russell J Mumper, David Ketelsen, Paul Dayton

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Molecular Ultrasound Imaging.Recent results in cancer research. Fortschritte der Krebsforschung. Progres dans les recherches sur le cancer · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Molecular Ultrasound Imaging.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Biomarkers in preclinical cancer imaging.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2015
    Review
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

James K TsurutaDepartment of Pediatrics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America ; Joint Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America ; North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States of America.
Nancy Klauber-DeMoreDepartment of Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America ; UNC McAllister Heart Institute, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.
Jason StreeterJoint Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America ; North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States of America.
Jennifer SamplesDepartment of Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.
Cam PattersonUNC McAllister Heart Institute, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.
Russell J MumperJoint Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America ; North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States of America ; Division of Molecular Pharmaceutics, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.
David KetelsenDepartment of Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.
Paul DaytonJoint Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America ; North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States of America ; Division of Molecular Pharmaceutics, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USNorth Carolina State University · US

Funding

TRAINING PROGRAM FOR MEDICAL SCIENTISTST32GM008716 · NIGMS · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI DEMORE, NANCY · 1999 to 2024
$9.3M
Signaling in endothelial growth & angiogenesisR01HL061656 · NHLBI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI PI, XINCHUN · 1999 to 2017
$5.8M
SFRP2 and NFAT are Therapeutic Targets in AngiosarcomaR01CA142657 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI DEMORE, NANCY · 2010 to 2014
$1.5M
Immune-Shielded, Ultrasound-Stimulated Contrast Agents for Molecular ImagingR01EB009066 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO · PI BORDEN, MARK ANDREW, DAYTON, PAUL A · 2008 to 2011
$1.2M
NCI NIH HHS 1R01CA142657-01A1NCI NIH HHS R01 CA142657NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL061656NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL61656NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB009066NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008716
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Angiosarcoma is a biologically aggressive vascular malignancy with a high metastatic potential. In the era of targeted medicine, knowledge of specific molecular tumor characteristics has become more important. Molecular imaging using targeted ultrasound contrast agents can monitor tumor progression non-invasively. Secreted frizzled related protein 2 (SFRP2) is a tumor endothelial marker expressed in angiosarcoma. We hypothesize that SFRP2-directed imaging could be a novel approach to imaging the tumor vasculature. To develop an SFRP2 contrast agent, SFRP2 polyclonal antibody was biotinylated and incubated with streptavidin-coated microbubbles. SVR angiosarcoma cells were injected into nude mice, and when tumors were established the mice were injected intravenously with the SFRP2 -targeted contrast agent, or a control streptavidin-coated contrast agent. SFRP2 -targeted contrast agent detected tumor vasculature with significantly more signal intensity than control contrast agent: the normalized fold-change was 1.6 ± 0.27 (n = 13, p = 0.0032). The kidney was largely devoid of echogenicity with no significant difference between the control contrast agent and the SFRP2-targeted contrast agent demonstrating that the SFRP2-targeted contrast agent was specific to tumor vessels. Plotting average pixel intensity obtained from SFRP2-targeted contrast agent against tumor volume showed that the average pixel intensity increased as tumor volume increased. In conclusion, molecularly-targeted imaging of SFRP2 visualizes angiosarcoma vessels, but not normal vessels, and intensity increases with tumor size. Molecular imaging of SFRP2 expression may provide a rapid, non-invasive method to monitor tumor regression during therapy for angiosarcoma and other SFRP2 expressing cancers, and contribute to our understanding of the biology of SFRP2 during tumor development and progression.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodiesBiomarkers, TumorBiotinylationCell Line, TumorContrast MediaGene ExpressionHemangiosarcomaMaleMembrane ProteinsMiceMice, NudeMicrobubblesMolecular ImagingNeoplasm TransplantationSecreted Frizzled-Related ProteinsAntibodiesBiomarkers, TumorContrast MediaMembrane ProteinsSecreted Frizzled-Related ProteinsSfrp2 protein, mouseStreptavidin

Identifiers

PMID24489757
PMCPMC3906081
OpenAlexW2069533006

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.