Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24489752›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Bovine pericardium patch wrapping intestinal anastomosis improves healing process and prevents leakage in a pig model.

Mario Testini, Angela Gurrado, Piero Portincasa, Salvatore Scacco, Andrea Marzullo, Giuseppe Piccinni, Germana Lissidini, Luigi Greco, Maria Antonietta De Salvia, Leonilde Bonfrate and 5 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02279771 (Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial of Transanal Reinforcement of Low Rectal Anastomosis Versus Protective Ileostomy in the Prevention of Anastomotic Leak After Rectal Cancer Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02279771 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2015, after this paper: background citation

Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial of Transanal Reinforcement of Low Rectal Anastomosis Versus Protective Ileostomy in the Prevention of Anastomotic Leak After Rectal Cancer Surgery

TypeinterventionalSponsorDonato F AltomareRan2015 to 2022Enrolled140ConditionsRectal CancerArmstransanal anastomotic reinforcement, protective ileostomy group, a circular anal dilator (CAD)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mario TestiniDepartment of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, Unit of Endocrine, Digestive and Emergency Surgery, University Medical School "A. Moro", Bari, Italy.
Angela GurradoDepartment of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, Unit of Endocrine, Digestive and Emergency Surgery, University Medical School "A. Moro", Bari, Italy.
Piero PortincasaDepartment of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, Unit of Medicine "A. Murri", University Medical School "A. Moro", Bari, Italy.
Salvatore ScaccoDepartment Basic Medical Sciences, University Medical School "A. Moro", Bari, Italy.
Andrea MarzulloDepartment of Emergency Surgery and Organ Transplantation, Unit of Pathology, University Medical School "A. Moro", Bari, Italy.
Giuseppe PiccinniDepartment of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, Unit of Endocrine, Digestive and Emergency Surgery, University Medical School "A. Moro", Bari, Italy.
Germana LissidiniDepartment of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, Unit of Endocrine, Digestive and Emergency Surgery, University Medical School "A. Moro", Bari, Italy.
Luigi GrecoDepartment of Emergency Surgery and Organ Transplantation, Unit of General Surgery and Liver Transplantation, University Medical School "A. Moro", Bari, Italy.
Maria Antonietta De SalviaDepartment of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, Section of Pharmachology, University Medical School "A. Moro", Bari, Italy.
Leonilde BonfrateDepartment of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, Unit of Medicine "A. Murri", University Medical School "A. Moro", Bari, Italy.
Lucantonio DebellisDepartment of Biosciences, Biotechnology and Pharmacological Sciences, University Medical School "A. Moro", Bari, Italy.
Nicola SardaroDepartment Basic Medical Sciences, University Medical School "A. Moro", Bari, Italy.
Francesco StaffieriDepartment of Emergency Surgery and Organ Transplantation, Division of Veterinary Clinics and Animal Productions, University Medical School "A. Moro", Bari, Italy.
Maria Rosaria CarratùDepartment of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, Section of Pharmachology, University Medical School "A. Moro", Bari, Italy.
Antonio CrovaceDepartment of Emergency Surgery and Organ Transplantation, Division of Veterinary Clinics and Animal Productions, University Medical School "A. Moro", Bari, Italy.
University of Bari Aldo Moro · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Failure of intestinal anastomosis is a major complication following abdominal surgery. Biological materials have been introduced as reinforcement of abdominal wall hernia in contaminated setting. An innovative application of biological patch is its use as reinforcement of gastrointestinal anastomosis. The aim of study was to verify whether the bovine pericardium patch improves the healing of anastomosis, when in vivo wrapping the suture line of pig intestinal anastomosis, avoiding leakage in the event of deliberately incomplete suture. Forty-three pigs were randomly divided: Group 1 (control, n = 14): hand-sewn ileo-ileal and colo-colic anastomosis; Group 2 (n = 14): standard anastomosis wrapped by pericardium bovine patch; Group 3 (n = 1) and 4 (n = 14): one suture was deliberately incomplete and also wrapped by patch in the last one. Intraoperative evaluation, histological, biochemical, tensiometric and electrophysiological studies of intestinal specimens were performed at 48 h, 7 and 90 days after. In groups 2 and 4, no leak, stenosis, abscess, peritonitis, mesh displacement or shrinkage were found and adhesion rate decreased compared to control. Biochemical studies showed mitochondrial function improvement in colic wrapped anastomosis. Tensiometric evaluations suggested that the patch preserves the colic contractility similar to the controls. Electrophysiological results demonstrated that the patch also improves the mucosal function restoring almost normal transport properties. Use of pericardium bovine patch as reinforcement of intestinal anastomosis is safe and effective, significantly improving the healing process. Data of prevention of acute peritonitis and leakage in cases of iatrogenic perforation of anastomoses, covered with patch, is unpublished.

Indexed as

Anastomosis, SurgicalAnimalsCattleColonFemaleIleumPericardiumPeristalsisPeritonitisRecovery of FunctionSurgical FlapsSurgical MeshSuturesSwineTransplantation, HeterologousWound Healing

Identifiers

PMID24489752
PMCPMC3906076
OpenAlexW1978636402

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.