ReviewTherapeutic advances in urology2014
New advances in erectile technology.
Review in Therapeutic advances in urology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- Probing penile hemodynamics by using photoplethysmography as objective indicators for male erection quality and sexual function.Scientific reports · 2021Trial
- Restorative therapy clinical trials for erectile dysfunction: a scoping review of endpoint measures.International journal of impotence research · 2023Article
- Alternative Treatment for Erectile Dysfunction: a Growing Arsenal in Men's Health.Current urology reports · 2021Review
- Application of Sex Aids in Men With Sexual Dysfunction: A Review.The journal of sexual medicine · 2019Review
- Genital vibration for sexual function and enhancement: a review of evidence.Sexual and relationship therapy : journal of the British Association for Sexual and Relationship Therapy · 2018Article
- Genital vibration for sexual function and enhancement: best practice recommendations for choosing and safely using a vibrator.Sexual and relationship therapy : journal of the British Association for Sexual and Relationship Therapy · 2018Article
- Erectile dysfunction treatment and traditional medicine-can East and West medicine coexist?Translational andrology and urology · 2017Review
- The controversy surrounding penile rehabilitation after radical prostatectomy.Translational andrology and urology · 2017Review
- Innovative trends and perspectives for erectile dysfunction treatment: A systematic review.Arab journal of urology · 2016Review
- Surgery and hormonal treatment for prostate cancer and sexual function.Translational andrology and urology · 2015Review
- Radiation-induced erectile dysfunction: Recent advances and future directions.Advances in radiation oncologyReview
- Penile rehabilitation following prostate cancer treatment: review of current literature.Asian journal of andrologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
New discoveries and technological advances in medicine are rapid. The role of technology in the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED) will be widened and more options will be available in the years to come. These erectile technologies include external penile support devices, penile vibrators, low intensity extracorporeal shockwave, tissue engineering, nanotechnology and endovascular technology. Even for matured treatment modalities for ED, such as vacuum erectile devices and penile implants, there is new scientific information and novel technology available to improve their usage and to stimulate new ideas. We anticipate that erectile technologies may revolutionize ED treatment and in the very near future ED may become a curable condition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.