Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24488617›Full record

ArticleMedical oncology (Northwood, London, England)2014

The difference in miR-21 expression levels between invasive and non-invasive breast cancers emphasizes its role in breast cancer invasion.

Nina Petrović, Vesna Mandušić, Boban Stanojević, Silvana Lukić, Lidija Todorović, Jelena Roganović, Bogomir Dimitrijević

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Breast Cancer Response to Therapy: Can microRNAs Lead the Way?Journal of mammary gland biology and neoplasia · 2021
    Review
  6. Evaluation of color Doppler ultrasound combined with plasma miR-21 and miR-27a in the diagnosis of breast cancer.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Levels of MicroRNA Heterogeneity in Cancer Biology.Molecular diagnosis & therapy · 2017
    Review
  12. MicroRNA in breast cancer: The association with BRCA1/2.Cancer biomarkers : section A of Disease markers · 2017
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nina PetrovićVinča Institute of Nuclear Sciences, University of Belgrade, Mike Petrovića Alasa 12-14, 11001, Belgrade, Serbia, dragoninspiration@yahoo.com.
Vesna Mandušić
Boban Stanojević
Silvana Lukić
Lidija Todorović
Jelena Roganović
Bogomir Dimitrijević
University of Belgrade · RSOncology Institute of Vojvodina · RS

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

MicroRNA-21 (miR-21) overexpression is characteristic for various types of tumors, but it is still unknown whether its expression levels differ between invasive and non-invasive breast carcinomas. The main goal of the study was to determine the difference in miR-21 expression among normal tissue, non-invasive, invasive with non-invasive component, and pure invasive breast cancer samples, to explain its potential role and significance in breast cancer invasiveness. The second goal was to propose miR-21 as molecular marker of breast cancer invasiveness and potential target for future anti-miR therapies for the prevention of invasion and metastasis. In order to reveal the role of miR-21 in breast cancer invasiveness, we measured miR-21 expression levels in 44 breast cancer and four normal samples by stem-loop real-time RT-PCR using TaqMan technology. Relative expression levels of miR-21 were significantly higher in invasive than in other groups (P=0.002) and significantly higher in invasive compared with invasive with non-invasive component group in histological (P=0.043) and nuclear grade 2 (P=0.036), estrogen-receptor-positive (ER+) (P=0.006), progesterone-receptor-positive (PR+) (P=0.008), ER+PR+ (P=0.007), and proliferation index (Ki-67)≤20% (P=0.036) tumors. Our findings suggest that miR-21 could be independent molecular marker of breast cancer invasiveness and potential target for future anti-miR therapies for the prevention of invasion and metastasis.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Ductal, BreastCarcinoma, LobularCase-Control StudiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansImmunoenzyme TechniquesLymphatic MetastasisMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingNeoplasm InvasivenessPrognosisReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, ProgesteroneRNA, Messenger

Identifiers

PMID24488617
OpenAlexW2045914107

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.