Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24488590›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education2014

Physician behaviors to promote informed decisions for prostate cancer screening: a National Research Network study.

Suzanne K Linder, Michael A Kallen, Patricia Dolan Mullen, James M Galliher, Paul R Swank, Evelyn C Y Chan, Robert J Volk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Feasibility Study of Engaging Barbershops for Prostate Cancer Education in Rural African-American Communities.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Suzanne K LinderDepartment of General Internal Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Pressler Street, Unit 1465, Houston, TX, 77030, USA, sklinder@mdanderson.org.
Michael A Kallen
Patricia Dolan Mullen
James M Galliher
Paul R Swank
Evelyn C Y Chan
Robert J Volk

Funding

Health Promotion and Disease Prevention Research CentersU48DP000057 · DP · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI TORTOLERO, SUSAN · 2004 to 2009
$17.0M
BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE EDUCATION--CANCER PREVENTION/CONTROLR25CA057712 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI MULLEN, PATRICIA DOLAN · 1992 to 2017
$8.6M
NCCDPHP CDC HHS U48 DP000057NCCDPHP CDC HHS U48DP000057-01NCI NIH HHS R25 CA057712NCI NIH HHS R25-CA-57712
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinical guidelines for prostate cancer screening (PCS) advise physicians to discuss the potential harms and benefits of screening. However, there is a lack of training programs for informed decision-making (IDM), and it is unknown which IDM behaviors physicians have the most difficulty performing. Identifying difficult behaviors can help tailor training programs. In the context of developing a physician-IDM program for PCS, we aimed to describe physicians' use of nine key IDM behaviors for the PCS discussion and to examine the relation between the behaviors and physician characteristics. A cross-sectional sample of The American Academy of Family Physicians National Research Network completed surveys about their behavior regarding PCS (N = 246; response rate = 58%). The surveys included nine physician key IDM behaviors for PCS and a single-item question describing their general practice style for PCS. The most common IDM behavior was to invite men to ask questions. The two least common reported behaviors concerned patients uncertain about screening (i.e., arrange follow-up and provide additional information for undecided men). Physicians reported difficulty with these two behaviors regardless whether they reported to discuss or not to discuss PCS with patients. Reported use of key IDM behaviors was associated with a general practice style for PCS and being affiliated with a residency-training program. Physician training programs for IDM should include physician skills to address the needs of patients uncertain about screening. Future research should determine if actual behavior is associated with self-reported behavior for the PCS discussion.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelDecision MakingPatient Education as TopicCross-Sectional StudiesEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansMalePatient ParticipationPhysician-Patient RelationsPhysiciansPractice Patterns, Physicians'Prostatic Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID24488590
PMCPMC5160960

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.