Trial reportHaematologica2014
A phase II multicenter rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin trial in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes identifying a novel model for response prediction.
Trial report in Haematologica, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00466843 (Mechanism and Response of Thymoglobulin in Patients With Myelodysplastic Syndrome), which is not on this map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Mechanism and Response of Thymoglobulin in Patients With Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS)
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.
- Use of immunosuppressive therapy for management of myelodysplastic syndromes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Haematologica · 2020Pooled it
- SF3B1 Mutations Negatively Predict for Response to Immunosuppressive Therapy in Myelodysplastic Syndromes.Clinical lymphoma, myeloma & leukemia · 2020Trial
- The use of immunosuppressive therapy in MDS: clinical outcomes and their predictors in a large international patient cohort.Blood advances · 2018Trial
- Advances and challenges in the treatment of myelodysplastic syndromes.Experimental hematology & oncology · 2025Review
- Myelodysplastic neoplasms with repeating TAFRO syndrome-like symptoms.International journal of hematology · 2025Article
- Myelodysplastic Neoplasms (MDS): The Current and Future Treatment Landscape.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2024Review
- Vaccines: a promising therapy for myelodysplastic syndrome.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2024Review
- The immunobiology of myelodysplastic neoplasms: a mini-review.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Review
- Article
- Myelodysplastic syndromes.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2022Review
- Diagnosis of Myelodysplastic Syndromes: From Immunological Observations to Clinical Applications.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- From Immune Dysregulations to Therapeutic Perspectives in Myelodysplastic Syndromes: A Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Management of the Older Patient with Myelodysplastic Syndrome.Drugs & aging · 2021Review
- [Prognostic factors of cyclosporine A combined with danazol with or without thalidomide in myelodysplastic syndrome treatment with low-percentage bone marrow blasts].Zhonghua xue ye xue za zhi = Zhonghua xueyexue zazhi · 2021Article
- Therapy for lower-risk MDS.Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2020Article
- Lowering the boom on lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes.Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2019Review
- Management of anemia in low-risk myelodysplastic syndromes treated with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents newer and older agents.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2018Review
- Infections in Myelodysplastic Syndrome in Relation to Stage and Therapy.Mediterranean journal of hematology and infectious diseases · 2018Review
- Treatment of low-risk myelodysplastic syndromes.Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2016Review
- Immune Mechanisms in Myelodysplastic Syndrome.International journal of molecular sciences · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Immune dysregulation is a mechanism contributing to ineffective hematopoiesis in a subset of myelodysplastic syndrome patients. We report the first US multicenter non-randomized, phase II trial examining the efficacy of rabbit(r)-anti-thymocyte globulin using 2.5 mg/kg/day administered daily for 4 doses. The primary end point was hematologic response; secondary end points included duration of response, time to response, time to progression, and tolerance. Nine (33%;95% confidence interval=17%-54%) of the 27 patients treated experienced durable hematologic improvement in an intent-to-treat analysis with a median time to response and median response duration of 75 and 245 days, respectively. While younger age is the most significant factor favoring equine(e)-anti-thymocyte globulin response, treatment outcome on this study was independent of age (P=0.499). A shorter duration between diagnosis and treatment showed a positive trend (P=0.18), but International Prognostic Scoring System score (P=0.150), karyotype (P=0.319), and age-adjusted bone marrow cellularity (P=0.369) were not associated with response classification. Since activated T-lymphocytes are the primary cellular target of anti-thymocyte globulin, a T-cell expression profiling was conducted in a cohort of 38 patients consisting of rabbit and equine-antithymocyte globulin-treated patients. A model containing disease duration, CD8 terminal memory T cells and T-cell proliferation-associated-antigen expression predicted response with the greatest accuracy using a leave-one-out cross validation approach. This profile categorized patients independent of other covariates, including treatment type and age using a leave-one-out-cross-validation approach (75.7%). Therefore, rabbit-anti-thymocyte globulin has hematologic remitting activity in myelodysplastic syndrome and a T-cell activation profile has potential utility classifying those who are more likely to respond (NCT00466843 clinicaltrials.gov).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.