Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24488511›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of epidemiology2014

Using natural language processing to improve efficiency of manual chart abstraction in research: the case of breast cancer recurrence.

David S Carrell, Scott Halgrim, Diem-Thy Tran, Diana S M Buist, Jessica Chubak, Wendy W Chapman, Guergana Savova

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of epidemiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 90 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
90citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

90 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

30 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

David S Carrell
Scott Halgrim
Diem-Thy Tran
Diana S M Buist
Jessica Chubak
Wendy W Chapman
Guergana Savova

Funding

Risk-based Imaging Strategies to Improve Breast Cancer Surveillance OutcomesP01CA154292 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI Diana L Miglioretti · 2011 to 2026
$52.9M
Long-term Survivorship in Older Women with Early Stage Breast CancerR01CA093772 · NCI · BOSTON MEDICAL CENTER · PI SILLIMAN, REBECCA A · 2003 to 2011
$7.5M
Commonly Used Medications and Breast Cancer RecurrenceR01CA120562 · NCI · KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN OF WASHINGTON · PI BOUDREAU, DENISE M · 2007 to 2011
$2.1M
Natural Language Processing for Cancer Research Network Surveillance StudiesRC1CA146917 · NCI · KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN OF WASHINGTON · PI CARRELL, DAVID S. · 2009 to 2010
$992k
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA154292NCI NIH HHS R01 CA093772NCI NIH HHS R01 CA120562NCI NIH HHS RC1 CA146917
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The increasing availability of electronic health records (EHRs) creates opportunities for automated extraction of information from clinical text. We hypothesized that natural language processing (NLP) could substantially reduce the burden of manual abstraction in studies examining outcomes, like cancer recurrence, that are documented in unstructured clinical text, such as progress notes, radiology reports, and pathology reports. We developed an NLP-based system using open-source software to process electronic clinical notes from 1995 to 2012 for women with early-stage incident breast cancers to identify whether and when recurrences were diagnosed. We developed and evaluated the system using clinical notes from 1,472 patients receiving EHR-documented care in an integrated health care system in the Pacific Northwest. A separate study provided the patient-level reference standard for recurrence status and date. The NLP-based system correctly identified 92% of recurrences and estimated diagnosis dates within 30 days for 88% of these. Specificity was 96%. The NLP-based system overlooked 5 of 65 recurrences, 4 because electronic documents were unavailable. The NLP-based system identified 5 other recurrences incorrectly classified as nonrecurrent in the reference standard. If used in similar cohorts, NLP could reduce by 90% the number of EHR charts abstracted to identify confirmed breast cancer recurrence cases at a rate comparable to traditional abstraction.

Indexed as

Natural Language ProcessingAgedAge FactorsBreast NeoplasmsElectronic Health RecordsFemaleHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalReference StandardsReproducibility of Resultsbreast cancer recurrencechart abstractionnatural language processing

Identifiers

PMID24488511
PMCPMC3939853

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.