ArticleCancer causes & control : CCC2014
Bilateral oophorectomy and risk of cancer in African American women.
Article in Cancer causes & control : CCC, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Association between hysterectomy, oophorectomy, and risk of breast cancer: a meta-analysis.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2025Pooled it
- Association between hysterectomy for benign indications and the risk of breast cancer: a systematic review and meta- analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Pooled it
- The increased risk of colorectal cancer in the women who underwent hysterectomy from the South Korean National Health Insurance Database.BMC women's health · 2023Article
- Hysterectomy, bilateral oophorectomy, and breast cancer risk in a racially diverse prospective cohort study.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2023Article
- Premenopausal gynecologic surgery and survival among black and white women with breast cancer.Cancer causes & control : CCC · 2020Article
- Subsequent Development of Epithelial Ovarian Cancer After Ovarian Surgery for Benign Ovarian Tumor: A Population-Based Cohort Study.Clinical epidemiology · 2020Article
- Examining the common aetiology of serous ovarian cancers and basal-like breast cancers using double primaries.British journal of cancer · 2017Article
- Removal of all ovarian tissue versus conserving ovarian tissue at time of hysterectomy in premenopausal patients with benign disease: study using routine data and data linkage.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2017Article
- Associations of Premenopausal Hysterectomy and Oophorectomy With Breast Cancer Among Black and White Women: The Carolina Breast Cancer Study, 1993-2001.American journal of epidemiology · 2016Article
- Hormone Use, Reproductive History, and Risk of Lung Cancer: The Women's Health Initiative Studies.Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeAfrican American women are more likely to undergo hysterectomy, with or without bilateral oophorectomy, at younger ages than white women. It is well established that women who have a bilateral oophorectomy at younger ages are at reduced risk of breast cancer, and there is some evidence of an increased risk of colorectal and lung cancer.
methodsUsing data from 44,514 women in the Black Women's Health Study, we prospectively investigated the relation of hysterectomy and oophorectomy to incidence of breast, colorectal, and lung cancer and to mortality from cancer. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using Cox proportional hazards regression with control for confounding factors.
resultsDuring 16 years of follow-up, hysterectomy alone, relative to no hysterectomy, was not associated with risk of breast, lung, or colorectal cancer. Bilateral oophorectomy, relative to hysterectomy with ovarian conservation, was inversely associated with risk of estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancer (HR 0.62; 95 % CI 0.45-0.85) but not with ER-negative breast cancer; age at surgery and menopausal hormone use did not modify the associations. HRs for the association of bilateral oophorectomy with incidence of colorectal and lung cancer were nonsignificantly increased for women who had surgery before age 40 years and had used menopausal hormones for less than 2 years (HR 1.65; 95 % CI 0.73-3.73 for colorectal cancer and HR 1.71; 95 % CI 0.68-4.31 for lung cancer). Bilateral oophorectomy was not associated with cancer mortality.
conclusionsBilateral oophorectomy was associated with reduced risk of ER+ breast cancer regardless of age at surgery and use of menopausal hormones. There were nonsignificant increases in risk of colorectal and lung cancer for women with oophorectomy at younger ages and short duration of menopausal hormone use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.