Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24487691›Full record

Trial reportBreast cancer research and treatment2014

Bone mineral density and circulating biomarkers in the BIG 1-98 trial comparing adjuvant letrozole, tamoxifen and their sequences.

Andrea Decensi, Zhuoxin Sun, Aliana Guerrieri-Gonzaga, Beat Thürlimann, Christina McIntosh, Carlo Tondini, Alain Monnier, Mario Campone, Marc Debled, Astrid Schönenberger and 7 more

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Bone Effects of Anti-Cancer Treatments in 2024.Calcified tissue international · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Andrea DecensiDivision of Medical Oncology, E.O. Ospedali Galliera, Mura delle Cappuccine 14, 16128, Genoa, Italy, andrea.decensi@galliera.it.
Zhuoxin Sun
Aliana Guerrieri-Gonzaga
Beat Thürlimann
Christina McIntosh
Carlo Tondini
Alain Monnier
Mario Campone
Marc Debled
Astrid Schönenberger
Khalil Zaman
Harriet Johansson
Karen N Price
Richard D Gelber
Aron Goldhirsch
Alan S Coates
Stefan Aebi

Funding

Training Grant in Quantitative Sciences for Cancer ResearchT32CA009337 · NCI · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (SCH OF PUBLIC HLTH) · PI QUACKENBUSH, JOHN, TRIPPA, LORENZO · 1986 to 2025
$12.3M
IBCSG STATISTICAL CENTER--A BREAST CANCER STUDY RESOURCEU24CA075362 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE · PI REGAN, MEREDITH M · 1997 to 2015
$7.5M
NCI NIH HHS CA-75362NCI NIH HHS T32 CA009337NCI NIH HHS U24 CA075362
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of the study is to determine the effects of the BIG 1-98 treatments on bone mineral density. BIG 1-98 compared 5-year adjuvant hormone therapy in postmenopausal women allocated to four groups: tamoxifen (T); letrozole (L); 2-years T, 3-years L (TL); and 2-years L, 3-years T (LT). Bone mineral density T-score was measured prospectively annually by dual energy X-ray absorption in 424 patients enrolled in a sub-study after 3 (n = 150), 4 (n = 200), and 5 years (n = 74) from randomization, and 1 year after treatment cessation. Prevalence of osteoporosis and the association of C-telopeptide, osteocalcin, and bone alkaline phosphatase with T-scores were assessed. At 3 years, T had the highest and TL the lowest T-score. All arms except for LT showed a decline up to 5 years, with TL exhibiting the greatest. At 5 years, there were significant differences on lumbar T-score only between T and TL, whereas for femur T-score, differences were significant for T versus L or TL, and L versus LT. The 5-year prevalence of spine and femur osteoporosis was the highest on TL (14.5 %, 7.1 %) then L (4.3 %, 5.1 %), LT (4.2 %, 1.4 %) and T (4 %, 0). C-telopeptide and osteocalcin were significantly associated with T-scores. While adjuvant L increases bone mineral density loss compared with T, the sequence LT has an acceptable bone safety profile. C-telopeptide and osteocalcin are useful markers of bone density that may be used to monitor bone health during treatment. The sequence LT may be a valid treatment option in patients with low and intermediate risk of recurrence.

Indexed as

AgedAlkaline PhosphataseAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalBiomarkers, TumorBone DensityBreast NeoplasmsChemotherapy, AdjuvantCollagen Type IDouble-Blind MethodDrug Administration ScheduleFemaleHumansLetrozoleMiddle AgedNitrilesOsteocalcinAlkaline PhosphataseAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalBiomarkers, TumorCollagen Type Icollagen type I trimeric cross-linked peptideLetrozoleNitrilesOsteocalcinPeptidesTamoxifenTriazoles

Identifiers

PMID24487691
PMCPMC3982877

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.