ArticleThe Journal of membrane biology2014
Shaker IR T449 mutants separate C- from U-type inactivation.
Article in The Journal of membrane biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Inactivation of Native K Channels.The Journal of membrane biology · 2022Article
- The activation gate controls steady-state inactivation and recovery from inactivation in Shaker.The Journal of general physiology · 2020Article
- The Selectivity Filter Is Involved in the U-Type Inactivation Process of Kv2.1 and Kv3.1 Channels.Biophysical journal · 2020Article
- Closed state-coupled C-type inactivation in BK channels.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2016Article
- K⁺ channel gating: C-type inactivation is enhanced by calcium or lanthanum outside.The Journal of general physiology · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Previous studies demonstrated that slow inactivation of the Shaker potassium channel can be made ~100-fold faster or slower by point mutations at a site in the outer pore (T449). However, the discovery that two forms of slow inactivation coexist in Shaker raises the question of which inactivation process is affected by mutation. Equivalent mutations in K(V)2.1, a channel exhibiting only U-type inactivation, have minimal effects on inactivation, suggesting that mutation of Shaker T449 acts on C-type inactivation alone, a widely held yet untested hypothesis. This study reexamines mutations at Shaker T449, confirming that T449A speeds inactivation and T449Y/V slow it. T449Y and T449V exhibit U-type inactivation that is enhanced by high extracellular potassium, in contrast to C-type inactivation in T449A which is inhibited by high potassium. Automated parameter estimation for a 12-state Markov model suggests that U-type inactivation occurs mainly from closed states upon weak depolarization, but primarily from the open state at positive voltages. The model also suggests that WT channels, which in this study exhibit mostly C-type inactivation, recover from inactivation through closed-inactivated states, producing voltage-dependent recovery. This suggests that both C-type and U-type inactivation involve both open-inactivated and closed-inactivated states.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.