Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24487417›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of clinical oncology2016

The Benefit of Chemotherapy in Esophageal Cancer Patients With Residual Disease After Trimodality Therapy.

Grace J Kim, Matthew Koshy, Alexandra L Hanlon, M Naomi Horiba, Martin J Edelman, Whitney M Burrows, Richard J Battafarano, Mohan Suntharalingam

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of clinical oncology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Survival after neoadjuvant approaches to gastroesophageal junction cancer.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Adjuvant chemotherapy and outcomes in esophageal carcinoma.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2017
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Grace J KimDepartments of *Radiation Oncology §Medical Oncology ∥Thoracic Surgery, University of Maryland Marlene and Stewart Greenebaum Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD †Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL ‡Department of Biostatistics, University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, Philadelphia, PA.
Matthew Koshy
Alexandra L Hanlon
M Naomi Horiba
Martin J Edelman
Whitney M Burrows
Richard J Battafarano
Mohan Suntharalingam
University of Maryland, Baltimore · USUniversity of Chicago · USUniversity of Maryland Marlene and Stewart Greenebaum Comprehensive Cancer Center

Funding

UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND GREENEBAUM CANCER CENTERSUPPORT GRANTP30CA134274 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI FEYRUZ VIRGILIA RASSOOL · 2008 to 2026
$51.0M
Telemere Targeted Therapy in Lung CancerR21CA130349 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI EDELMAN, MARTIN J. · 2009 to 2011
$527k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA134274NCI NIH HHS R21 CA130349
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe objective of this retrospective study was to determine the potential benefits of chemotherapy in esophageal cancer patients treated with chemoradiation followed by surgery. MATERIALS AND

methodsAt our institution, 145 patients completed trimodality therapy from 1993 to 2009. Neoadjuvant treatment predominantly consisted of 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin with a concurrent median radiation dose of 50.4 Gy. Sixty-two patients received chemotherapy postoperatively. The majority (49/62) received 3 cycles of docetaxel.

resultsWithin the entire cohort, a 5-year overall survival (OS) benefit was found in those who received postoperative chemotherapy, OS 37.1% versus 18.0% (P=0.024). The response after neoadjuvant chemoradiation was as follows: 33.8% had a pathologic complete response and 62.8% with residual disease. A 5-year OS and cause-specific survival (CSS) advantage were associated with postoperative chemotherapy among those with macroscopic residual disease after neoadjuvant therapy: OS 38.7% versus 13.9% (P=0.016), CSS 42.8% versus 18.8% (P=0.048). This benefit was not seen in those with a pathologic complete response or those with microscopic residual. A stepwise multivariate Cox regression model evaluating the partial response group revealed that postoperative chemotherapy and M stage were independent predictors of overall and CSS.

conclusionsThis analysis revealed that patients with gross residual disease after trimodality therapy for esophageal cancer who received postoperative chemotherapy had an improved overall and CSS. These data suggest that patients with residual disease after trimodality therapy and a reasonable performance status may benefit from postoperative chemotherapy. Prospective trials are needed to confirm these results to define the role of postoperative treatment after trimodality therapy.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAdultCarcinoma, Squamous CellChemoradiotherapyChemotherapy, AdjuvantCisplatinDocetaxelEsophageal NeoplasmsEsophagectomyFemaleFluorouracilHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedNeoadjuvant TherapyCisplatinDocetaxelFluorouracilTaxoids

Identifiers

PMID24487417
PMCPMC5613244
OpenAlexW2331986318

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.