Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24486639›Full record

ReviewPhysics in medicine and biology2014

GPU-based high-performance computing for radiation therapy.

Xun Jia, Peter Ziegenhein, Steve B Jiang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Physics in medicine and biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Improving Proton Dose Calculation Accuracy by Using Deep Learning.Machine learning: science and technology · 2021
    Article
  10. Whole-body voxel-based internal dosimetry using deep learning.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Monte Carlo verification of radiotherapy treatments with CloudMC.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2018
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Xun JiaDeparment of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA.
Peter Ziegenhein
Steve B Jiang

Funding

Low dose cone beam CT for image guided adaptive radiotherapyR01CA154747 · NCI · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI JIANG, STEVE BIN · 2011 to 2015
$1.4M
NCI NIH HHS 1R01CA154747-01NCI NIH HHS R01 CA154747
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent developments in radiotherapy therapy demand high computation powers to solve challenging problems in a timely fashion in a clinical environment. The graphics processing unit (GPU), as an emerging high-performance computing platform, has been introduced to radiotherapy. It is particularly attractive due to its high computational power, small size, and low cost for facility deployment and maintenance. Over the past few years, GPU-based high-performance computing in radiotherapy has experienced rapid developments. A tremendous amount of study has been conducted, in which large acceleration factors compared with the conventional CPU platform have been observed. In this paper, we will first give a brief introduction to the GPU hardware structure and programming model. We will then review the current applications of GPU in major imaging-related and therapy-related problems encountered in radiotherapy. A comparison of GPU with other platforms will also be presented.

Indexed as

Computer GraphicsComputing MethodologiesDiagnostic ImagingHumansRadiotherapy, Computer-Assisted

Identifiers

PMID24486639
PMCPMC4003902

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.