Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24486144›Full record

ArticleSchizophrenia research2014

Resting EEG in psychosis and at-risk populations--a possible endophenotype?

Siri Ranlund, Judith Nottage, Madiha Shaikh, Anirban Dutt, Miguel Constante, Muriel Walshe, Mei-Hua Hall, Karl Friston, Robin Murray, Elvira Bramon

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Schizophrenia research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Thalamocortical dysrhythmia in patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorder and individuals at clinical high risk for psychosis.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Siri RanlundMental Health Sciences Unit & Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, W1W 7EJ, United Kingdom. Electronic address: s.ranlund@ucl.ac.uk.
Judith NottageNIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health at the South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Psychiatry, Kings College London, WC2R 2LS, United Kingdom.
Madiha ShaikhNIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health at the South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Psychiatry, Kings College London, WC2R 2LS, United Kingdom; Department of Psychology, Royal Holloway, University of London, TW20 0EX, United Kingdom.
Anirban DuttNIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health at the South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Psychiatry, Kings College London, WC2R 2LS, United Kingdom.
Miguel ConstantePsychiatry Department, Hospital Beatriz Ângelo, 2674-514 Loures, Lisbon, Portugal.
Muriel WalsheMental Health Sciences Unit & Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, W1W 7EJ, United Kingdom; NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health at the South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Psychiatry, Kings College London, WC2R 2LS, United Kingdom.
Mei-Hua HallPsychology Research Laboratory, Harvard Medical School, McLean Hospital, Belmont, MA 02478, USA.
Karl FristonThe Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, University College London, WC1N 3BG, United Kingdom.
Robin MurrayNIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health at the South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Psychiatry, Kings College London, WC2R 2LS, United Kingdom.
Elvira BramonMental Health Sciences Unit & Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, W1W 7EJ, United Kingdom; NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health at the South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Psychiatry, Kings College London, WC2R 2LS, United Kingdom.
Centre for Mental Health · GBSouth London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust · GBHospital Beatriz Ângelo · PTMcLean Hospital · USUniversity College London · GBWellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging · GB

Funding

Department of Health PDA/02/06/016Medical Research Council G0901310Wellcome Trust 088130Wellcome Trust 091593
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFinding reliable endophenotypes for psychosis could lead to an improved understanding of aetiology, and provide useful alternative phenotypes for genetic association studies. Resting quantitative electroencephalography (QEEG) activity has been shown to be heritable and reliable over time. However, QEEG research in patients with psychosis has shown inconsistent and even contradictory findings, and studies of at-risk populations are scarce. Hence, this study aimed to investigate whether resting QEEG activity represents a candidate endophenotype for psychosis.

methodQEEG activity at rest was compared in four frequency bands (delta, theta, alpha, and beta), between chronic patients with psychosis (N=48), first episode patients (N=46), at-risk populations ("at risk mental state", N=33; healthy relatives of patients, N=45), and healthy controls (N=107).

resultsResults showed that chronic patients had significantly increased resting QEEG amplitudes in delta and theta frequencies compared to healthy controls. However, first episode patients and at-risk populations did not differ from controls in these frequency bands. There were no group differences in alpha or beta frequency bands.

conclusionSince no abnormalities were found in first episode patients, ARMS, or healthy relatives, resting QEEG activity in the frequency bands examined is unlikely to be related to genetic predisposition to psychosis. Rather than endophenotypes, the low frequency abnormalities observed in chronic patients are probably related to illness progression and/or to the long-term effects of treatments.

Indexed as

ElectroencephalographyEndophenotypesRestAdultBrain WavesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPsychotic DisordersRiskYoung AdultAt risk mental stateElectroencephalogramEndophenotypePsychosisResting EEGSchizophrenia

Identifiers

PMID24486144
PMCPMC3969576
OpenAlexW1999187034

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.