Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24484895›Full record

ReviewAdvances in colloid and interface science2014

A bottom-up approach to understanding protein layer formation at solid-liquid interfaces.

Mark Kastantin, Blake B Langdon, Daniel K Schwartz

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Advances in colloid and interface science, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Reversible Adsorption Kinetics of Near Surface Dimer Colloids.Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids · 2016
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mark KastantinDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309, United States.
Blake B LangdonDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309, United States.
Daniel K SchwartzDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309, United States. Electronic address: daniel.schwartz@colorado.edu.

Funding

Tools to Connect Protein Conformations, Dynamics, and AssociationsR21EB015532 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO · PI SCHWARTZ, DANIEL · 2012 to 2013
$375k
NIBIB NIH HHS 5R21EB015532-02NIBIB NIH HHS R21 EB015532
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A common goal across different fields (e.g. separations, biosensors, biomaterials, pharmaceuticals) is to understand how protein behavior at solid-liquid interfaces is affected by environmental conditions. Temperature, pH, ionic strength, and the chemical and physical properties of the solid surface, among many factors, can control microscopic protein dynamics (e.g. adsorption, desorption, diffusion, aggregation) that contribute to macroscopic properties like time-dependent total protein surface coverage and protein structure. These relationships are typically studied through a top-down approach in which macroscopic observations are explained using analytical models that are based upon reasonable, but not universally true, simplifying assumptions about microscopic protein dynamics. Conclusions connecting microscopic dynamics to environmental factors can be heavily biased by potentially incorrect assumptions. In contrast, more complicated models avoid several of the common assumptions but require many parameters that have overlapping effects on predictions of macroscopic, average protein properties. Consequently, these models are poorly suited for the top-down approach. Because the sophistication incorporated into these models may ultimately prove essential to understanding interfacial protein behavior, this article proposes a bottom-up approach in which direct observations of microscopic protein dynamics specify parameters in complicated models, which then generate macroscopic predictions to compare with experiment. In this framework, single-molecule tracking has proven capable of making direct measurements of microscopic protein dynamics, but must be complemented by modeling to combine and extrapolate many independent microscopic observations to the macro-scale. The bottom-up approach is expected to better connect environmental factors to macroscopic protein behavior, thereby guiding rational choices that promote desirable protein behaviors.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalAdsorptionAnimalsBiophysical PhenomenaBiophysicsDiffusionHumansHydrophobic and Hydrophilic InteractionsKineticsMembrane ProteinsProtein AggregatesProtein ConformationSolubilitySurface PropertiesMembrane ProteinsProtein AggregatesAdsorptionDesorptionInterfacial diffusionProtein aggregationSingle-molecule

Identifiers

PMID24484895
PMCPMC4028386

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.