Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24484675›Full record

ArticleBiomaterials2014

A tunable silk-alginate hydrogel scaffold for stem cell culture and transplantation.

Keren Ziv, Harald Nuhn, Yael Ben-Haim, Laura S Sasportas, Paul J Kempen, Thomas P Niedringhaus, Michael Hrynyk, Robert Sinclair, Annelise E Barron, Sanjiv S Gambhir

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomaterials, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 95 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Mycelial growth of wood fungusMaterials today. Bio · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Silk Biomaterials with Vascularization Capacity.Advanced functional materials · 2016
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Keren ZivMolecular Imaging Program at Stanford (MIPS), Department of Radiology, CA, USA.
Harald NuhnDepartment of Bioengineering, Stanford University, CA, USA.
Yael Ben-HaimMolecular Imaging Program at Stanford (MIPS), Department of Radiology, CA, USA.
Laura S SasportasMolecular Imaging Program at Stanford (MIPS), Department of Radiology, CA, USA; Department of Bioengineering, Stanford University, CA, USA.
Paul J KempenDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Stanford University, CA, USA.
Thomas P NiedringhausDepartment of Bioengineering, Stanford University, CA, USA.
Michael HrynykDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Queen's University, Ontario, Canada.
Robert SinclairDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Stanford University, CA, USA.
Annelise E BarronDepartment of Bioengineering, Stanford University, CA, USA.
Sanjiv S GambhirMolecular Imaging Program at Stanford (MIPS), Department of Radiology, CA, USA; Department of Bioengineering, Stanford University, CA, USA; Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Stanford University, CA, USA. Electronic address: sgambhir@stanford.edu.
Stanford University · USQueen's University · CAStanford Medicine · US

Funding

Stanford Nanocharacterization LaboratoryU54CA119367 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI GAMBHIR, SANJIV S · 2006 to 2010
$19.8M
Pilot ProjectsU54CA151459 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI GAMBHIR, SANJIV S · 2010 to 2014
$12.6M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNCI NIH HHS U54 CA119367NCI NIH HHS U54 CA151459NCI NIH HHS U54 U54CA151459
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One of the major challenges in regenerative medicine is the ability to recreate the stem cell niche, which is defined by its signaling molecules, the creation of cytokine gradients, and the modulation of matrix stiffness. A wide range of scaffolds has been developed in order to recapitulate the stem cell niche, among them hydrogels. This paper reports the development of a new silk-alginate based hydrogel with a focus on stem cell culture. This biocomposite allows to fine tune its elasticity during cell culture, addressing the importance of mechanotransduction during stem cell differentiation. The silk-alginate scaffold promotes adherence of mouse embryonic stem cells and cell survival upon transplantation. In addition, it has tunable stiffness as function of the silk-alginate ratio and the concentration of crosslinker--a characteristic that is very hard to accomplish in current hydrogels. The hydrogel and the presented results represents key steps on the way of creating artificial stem cell niche, opening up new paths in regenerative medicine.

Indexed as

HydrogelsStem Cell TransplantationTissue ScaffoldsAlginatesAnimalsCell AdhesionEmbryonic Stem CellsEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayMiceMice, Inbred BALB CMicroscopy, Electron, ScanningRatsSilkAlginatesHydrogelsSilkAlginateElasticityLamininScaffoldSilkStem cells

Identifiers

PMID24484675
PMCPMC3971886
OpenAlexW2032276333

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.