Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24484546›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2014

The chromatin architectural proteins HMGD1 and H1 bind reciprocally and have opposite effects on chromatin structure and gene regulation.

Narasimharao Nalabothula, Graham McVicker, John Maiorano, Rebecca Martin, Jonathan K Pritchard, Yvonne N Fondufe-Mittendorf

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. The Chromatin Regulator HMGA1a Undergoes Phase Separation in the Nucleus.Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology · 2023
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Linker histone H1 and protein-protein interactions.Biochimica et biophysica acta · 2016
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Narasimharao Nalabothula
Graham McVicker
John Maiorano
Rebecca Martin
Jonathan K Pritchard
Yvonne N Fondufe-MittendorfDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40536, USA. y.fondufe-mittendorf@uky.edu.
University of Kentucky · USDana-Farber Cancer Institute · USNorthwestern University · USStanford University · US

Funding

UNDERSTANDING THE MOLECULAR BASIS OF EPIGENETIC TRANSCRIPTIONAL SILENCINGP20RR020171 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI LOUIS HERSH, LOUIS HERSH LOUIS HERSH · 2004 to 2011
$16.5M
Genetic and epigenetic controls of gene regulationU01HG007036 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI PRITCHARD, JONATHAN K · 2012 to 2015
$1.4M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNCRR NIH HHS 2P20 RR020171NCRR NIH HHS P20 RR020171NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG 007036NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG007036
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChromatin architectural proteins interact with nucleosomes to modulate chromatin accessibility and higher-order chromatin structure. While these proteins are almost certainly important for gene regulation they have been studied far less than the core histone proteins.

resultsHere we describe the genomic distributions and functional roles of two chromatin architectural proteins: histone H1 and the high mobility group protein HMGD1 in Drosophila S2 cells. Using ChIP-seq, biochemical and gene specific approaches, we find that HMGD1 binds to highly accessible regulatory chromatin and active promoters. In contrast, H1 is primarily associated with heterochromatic regions marked with repressive histone marks. We find that the ratio of HMGD1 to H1 binding is a better predictor of gene activity than either protein by itself, which suggests that reciprocal binding between these proteins is important for gene regulation. Using knockdown experiments, we show that HMGD1 and H1 affect the occupancy of the other protein, change nucleosome repeat length and modulate gene expression.

conclusionCollectively, our data suggest that dynamic and mutually exclusive binding of H1 and HMGD1 to nucleosomes and their linker sequences may control the fluid chromatin structure that is required for transcriptional regulation. This study provides a framework to further study the interplay between chromatin architectural proteins and epigenetics in gene regulation.

Indexed as

Gene Expression RegulationAnimalsCell LineChromatinCluster AnalysisDrosophilaDrosophila ProteinsHigh Mobility Group ProteinsHistonesNucleosomesPromoter Regions, GeneticProtein BindingProtein Processing, Post-TranslationalRNA InterferenceRNA, Small InterferingTranscription Initiation SiteChromatinDrosophila ProteinsHigh Mobility Group ProteinsHistonesHmgD protein, DrosophilaNucleosomesRNA, Small Interfering

Identifiers

PMID24484546
PMCPMC3928079
OpenAlexW2154507579

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.