ArticleJournal of neurosurgery2014
An extent of resection threshold for recurrent glioblastoma and its risk for neurological morbidity.
Article in Journal of neurosurgery, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 108 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
108 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 264 citations in OpenAlex.
- Surgical treatment of recurrent glioblastoma: a multicenter perspective from the Italian society of neurosurgery (SINchNeurosurgical review · 2026Pooled it
- Determinants of survival after re-resection for recurrent glioblastoma: a meta-analysis.Acta neurochirurgica · 2026Pooled it
- EANS-EANO guidelines on the extent of resection in gliomas.Neuro-oncology · 2026Guideline
- The impact of intraoperative mapping during re-resection in recurrent gliomas: a systematic review.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2025Pooled it
- The use of intraoperative tractography in brain tumor and epilepsy surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in neuroimaging · 2025Pooled it
- Surgical management of Glioma Grade 4: technical update from the neuro-oncology section of the Italian Society of Neurosurgery (SINch®): a systematic review.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2023Pooled it
- Reducing complication rates for repeat craniotomies in glioma patients: a single-surgeon experience and comparison with the literature.Acta neurochirurgica · 2022Pooled it
- Assessing the efficacy of repeat resections in recurrent glioblastoma: a systematic review.Neurosurgical review · 2021Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Association between medical academic genealogy and publication outcome: impact of unconscious bias on scientific objectivity.Acta neurochirurgica · 2019Pooled it
- Post-chemoradiation volumetric response predicts survival in newly diagnosed glioblastoma treated with radiation, temozolomide, and bevacizumab or placebo.Neuro-oncology · 2018Trial
- Validation of postoperative residual contrast-enhancing tumor volume as an independent prognostic factor for overall survival in newly diagnosed glioblastoma.Neuro-oncology · 2018Trial
- Prospective trial evaluating the sensitivity and specificity of 3,4-dihydroxy-6-[18F]-fluoro-L-phenylalanine (18F-DOPA) PET and MRI in patients with recurrent gliomas.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2018Trial
- Baseline pretreatment contrast enhancing tumor volume including central necrosis is a prognostic factor in recurrent glioblastoma: evidence from single and multicenter trials.Neuro-oncology · 2017Trial
- Complete resection of contrast-enhancing tumor volume is associated with improved survival in recurrent glioblastoma-results from the DIRECTOR trial.Neuro-oncology · 2016Trial
- Post-recurrence management of malignant glial brain tumors: therapeutic strategies, evidence and limitations, palliative care, terminal sedation, and end-of-life considerations.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026Review
- Surgical characteristics and postoperative outcomes in a retrospective cohort study of patients with molecularly defined oligodendroglioma.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2026Article
- Unraveling the Molecular Mechanisms of Glioma Recurrence: A Study Integrating Single-Cell and Spatial Transcriptomics.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2026Article
- MGMT promoter methylation modulates the effect of residual tumor on survival after re-resection of recurrent glioblastoma.Acta neuropathologica communications · 2026Article
- Relevance of a complete re-resection of contrast enhancing tumor in MGMT promotor non-methylated versus methylated recurrent glioblastomas.Brain & spine · 2026Article
48 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
13 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectDespite improvements in the medical and surgical management of patients with glioblastoma, tumor recurrence remains inevitable. For recurrent glioblastoma, however, the clinical value of a second resection remains uncertain. Specifically, what proportion of contrast-enhancing recurrent glioblastoma tissue must be removed to improve overall survival and what is the neurological cost of incremental resection beyond this threshold?
methodsThe authors identified 170 consecutive patients with recurrent supratentorial glioblastomas treated at the Barrow Neurological Institute from 2001 to 2011. All patients previously had a de novo glioblastoma and following their initial resection received standard temozolomide and fractionated radiotherapy.
resultsThe mean clinical follow-up was 22.6 months and no patient was lost to follow-up. At the time of recurrence, the median preoperative tumor volume was 26.1 cm(3). Following re-resection, median postoperative tumor volume was 3.1 cm(3), equating to an 87.4% extent of resection (EOR). The median overall survival was 19.0 months, with a median progression-free survival following re-resection of 5.2 months. Using Cox proportional hazards analysis, the variables of age, Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) score, and EOR were predictive of survival following repeat resection (p = 0.0001). Interestingly, a significant survival advantage was noted with as little as 80% EOR. Recursive partitioning analysis validated these findings and provided additional risk stratification at the highest levels of EOR. Overall, at 7 days after surgery, a deterioration in the NIH stroke scale score by 1 point or more was observed in 39.1% of patients with EOR ≥ 80% as compared with 16.7% for those with EOR < 80% (p = 0.0049). This disparity in neurological morbidity, however, did not endure beyond 30 days postoperatively (p = 0.1279).
conclusionsFor recurrent glioblastomas, an improvement in overall survival can be attained beyond an 80% EOR. This survival benefit must be balanced against the risk of neurological morbidity, which does increase with more aggressive cytoreduction, but only in the early postoperative period. Interestingly, this putative EOR threshold closely approximates that reported for newly diagnosed glioblastomas, suggesting that for a subset of patients, the survival benefit of microsurgical resection does not diminish despite biological progression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.