Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24484178›Full record

Trial reportHuman gene therapy2014

Results of a randomized phase I gene therapy clinical trial of nononcolytic fowlpox viruses encoding T cell costimulatory molecules.

Howard L Kaufman, Dae Won Kim, Seunghee Kim-Schulze, Gail DeRaffele, Michael C Jagoda, Joseph R Broucek, Andrew Zloza

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Human gene therapy, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Clinical Application of Oncolytic Viruses: A Systematic Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Howard L Kaufman1 Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers University , New Brunswick, NJ 08903.
Dae Won Kim
Seunghee Kim-Schulze
Gail DeRaffele
Michael C Jagoda
Joseph R Broucek
Andrew Zloza
Columbia University · USRush University Medical Center · USRutgers, The State University of New Jersey · US

Funding

ENHANCING TUMOR VACCINES WITH CO-STIMULATORY MOLECULESR01CA093696 · NCI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI KAUFMAN, HOWARD L. · 2002 to 2004
$952k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA093696
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oncolytic viruses have shown promise as gene delivery vehicles in the treatment of cancer; however, their efficacy may be inhibited by the induction of anti-viral antibody titers. Fowlpox virus is a nonreplicating and nononcolytic vector that has been associated with lesser humoral but greater cell-mediated immunity in animal tumor models. To test whether fowlpox virus gene therapy is safe and can elicit immune responses in patients with cancer, we conducted a randomized phase I clinical trial of two recombinant fowlpox viruses encoding human B7.1 or a triad of costimulatory molecules (B7.1, ICAM-1, and LFA-3; TRICOM). Twelve patients (10 with melanoma and 2 with colon adenocarcinoma) enrolled in the trial and were randomized to rF-B7.1 or rF-TRICOM administered in a dose escalation manner (~3.7×10(7) or ~3.7×10(8) plaque-forming units) by intralesional injection every 4 weeks. The therapy was well tolerated, with only four patients experiencing grade 1 fever or injection site pain, and there were no serious adverse events. All patients developed anti-viral antibody titers after vector delivery, and posttreatment anti-carcinoembryonic antigen antibody titers were detected in the two patients with colon cancer. All patients developed CD8(+) T cell responses against fowlpox virus, but few responses against defined tumor-associated antigens were observed. This is the first clinical trial of direct (intratumoral) gene therapy with a nononcolytic fowlpox virus. Treatment was well tolerated in patients with metastatic cancer; all subjects exhibited anti-viral antibody responses, but limited tumor-specific T cell responses were detected. Nononcolytic fowlpox viruses are safe and induce limited T cell responses in patients with cancer. Further development may include prime-boost strategies using oncolytic viruses for initial priming.

Indexed as

Genetic TherapyAgedAged, 80 and overAntibody FormationAntigens, NeoplasmCancer VaccinesEpitopesFemaleFowlpox virusHLA-A2 AntigenHumansInterferon-gammaMaleMiddle AgedOncolytic VirusesT-LymphocytesAntigens, NeoplasmCancer VaccinesEpitopesHLA-A2 AntigenInterferon-gammarF-B7.1 vaccinerF-TRICOM vaccineVaccines, Synthetic

Identifiers

PMID24484178
PMCPMC4027985
OpenAlexW2317496861

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.