ArticleTelemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association2014
Heart failure patients' perceptions and use of technology to manage disease symptoms.
Article in Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Patients' experiences of mobile health tools for chronic heart failure self-management: a qualitative meta-synthesis.BMJ open · 2026Pooled it
- Perspectives and Experiences of Self-monitoring of Blood Pressure Among Patients With Hypertension: A Systematic Review of Qualitative Studies.American journal of hypertension · 2023Pooled it
- Self-Care Experiences of Individuals with Heart Failure: A Systematic Review and Metasynthesis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Review
- Patient's Perceptions of a Centralized Virtual Ward for Remote Patient Monitoring in Primary Care: Qualitative Study.JMIR human factors · 2025Article
- Review
- Factors Affecting Patient and Physician Engagement in Remote Health Care for Heart Failure: Systematic Review.JMIR cardio · 2022Review
- A review of smart sensors coupled with Internet of Things and Artificial Intelligence approach for heart failure monitoring.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2021Review
- Decision-making Factors Associated With Telehealth Adoption by Patients With Heart Failure at Home: A Qualitative Study.Computers, informatics, nursing : CIN · 2020Article
- Rise of the machines: will heart failure become the first cyber-specialty?The British journal of cardiology · 2020Article
- Evaluating the Use of Mobile Health Technology in Older Adults With Heart Failure: Mixed-Methods Study.JMIR aging · 2018Article
- Factors Affecting the Acceptance of Telehealth Services by Heart Failure Patients: An Integrative Review.Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association · 2018Review
- Implementation of a Home Monitoring System for Heart Failure Patients: A Feasibility Study.JMIR research protocols · 2017Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTechnology use for symptom management is beneficial for both patients and physicians. Widespread acceptance of technology use in healthcare fuels continued development of technology with ever-increasing sophistication. Although acceptance of technology use in healthcare by medical professionals is evident, less is known about the perceptions, preferences, and use of technology by heart failure (HF) patients. This study explores patients' perceptions and current use of technology for managing HF symptoms (MHFS). MATERIALS AND
methodsA qualitative analysis of in-depth individual interviews using a constant comparative approach for emerging themes was conducted. Fifteen participants (mean age, 64.43 years) with HF were recruited from hospitals, cardiology clinics, and community groups.
resultsAll study participants reported use of a home monitoring device, such as an ambulatory blood pressure device or bathroom scale. The majority of participants reported not accessing online resources for additional MHFS information. However, several participants stated their belief that technology would be useful for MHFS. Participants reported increased access to care, earlier indication of a worsening condition, increased knowledge, and greater convenience as potential benefits of technology use while managing HF symptoms. For most participants financial cost, access issues, satisfaction with current self-care routine, mistrust of technology, and reliance on routine management by their current healthcare provider precluded their use of technology for MHFS.
conclusionsKnowledge about HF patients' perceptions of technology use for self-care and better understanding of issues associated with technology access can aid in the development of effective health behavior interventions for individuals who are MHFS and may result in increased compliance, better outcomes, and lower healthcare costs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.