Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24482553›Full record

ArticleWork and stress2013

Psychosocial risk assessment in organizations: Concurrent validity of the brief version of the Management Standards Indicator Tool.

Jonathan Houdmont, Raymond Randall, Robert Kerr, Ken Addley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Work and stress, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Questionnaire Review: Management Standards Indicator Tool.Occupational medicine (Oxford, England) · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Management standards and burnout among surgeons in the United Kingdom.Occupational medicine (Oxford, England) · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. What Does a Single-Item Measure of Job Stressfulness Assess?International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Psychometric Properties of a 36-Item Version of the "Stress Management Competency Indicator Tool".International journal of environmental research and public health · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jonathan HoudmontSchool of Medicine, University of Nottingham, UK.
Raymond RandallSchool of Business and Economics, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK.
Robert KerrDepartment of Management and Leadership, University of Ulster, UK.
Ken AddleyNorthern Ireland Civil Service Occupational Health Service, Belfast, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Management Standards Indicator Tool (MSIT) is a 35-item self-report measure of the psychosocial work environment designed to assist organizations with psychosocial risk assessment. It is also used in work environment research. Edwards and Webster presented a 25-item version of the MSIT based on the deletion of items having a factor loading of < .65. Stress theory and research suggest that psychosocial hazard exposures may result in harm to the health of workers. Thus, using data collected from three UK organizations (

Indexed as

Management Standards Indicator Toolpsychosocial work environmentvaliditywork-related stress

Identifiers

PMID24482553
PMCPMC3898543

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.