Trial reportThe journal of behavioral health services & research2014
Do comprehensive, coordinated, recovery-oriented services alter the pattern of use of treatment services? Mental health treatment study impacts on SSDI beneficiaries' use of inpatient, emergency, and crisis services.
Trial report in The journal of behavioral health services & research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Individual placement and support: History, current status, and future directions.PCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences · 2023Review
- Consumers' Suggestions for Improving the Mental Healthcare System: Options, Autonomy, and Respect.Community mental health journal · 2019Article
- Modeling Relationships Involving Perceived Recovery Orientation of Mental Health Teams Among Quebec Mental Health Professionals.The journal of behavioral health services & research · 2019Article
- Work-related variables associated with perceptions of recovery-oriented care among Quebec mental health professionals.BJPsych open · 2018Article
- Affordable Care Act and behavioral health services: special section editor's note.The journal of behavioral health services & research · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Current arrangements for financing and delivering behavioral health services to U.S. working-age adults with severe and persistent mental disorders (SPMD) have major inadequacies in funding for and access to critical elements of a recovery-oriented, comprehensive, and coordinated package of community-based treatment and rehabilitation services. This study presents results from a nation-wide 2-year randomized trial, involving 2,238 SSDI beneficiaries with SPMD, of a comprehensive intervention including evidence-based treatment and employment services. Estimates of impacts of the MHTS service intervention package, from a variety of regression specifications, showed clearly significant treatment group reductions in four outcomes (hospital stays and days, ER visits for mental health problems, and psychiatric crisis visits); these estimates suggest annual inpatient hospital treatment cost savings in excess of approximately $900 to 1,400. Negative estimated MHTS effects on three other utilization outcomes (hospital stays and days for mental health problems, overall ER visits) generally did not achieve statistical significance. Possible study implications for cost offsets from further expansions/replications of the MHTS intervention model are considered within the context of health reform.
Indexed as
Identifiers
24481541What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.