Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24480852›Full record

ReviewIntegrative biology : quantitative biosciences from nano to macro2014

Unraveling intestinal stem cell behavior with models of crypt dynamics.

Alexis J Carulli, Linda C Samuelson, Santiago Schnell

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Integrative biology : quantitative biosciences from nano to macro, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Enteroids expressing a disease-associated mutant of EpCAM are a model for congenital tufting enteropathy.American journal of physiology. Gastrointestinal and liver physiology · 2019
    Article
  17. Asymmetric cell division-dominant neutral drift model for normal intestinal stem cell homeostasis.American journal of physiology. Gastrointestinal and liver physiology · 2019
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Alexis J CarulliDepartment of Molecular & Integrative Physiology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA. acarulli@umich.edu.
Linda C Samuelson
Santiago Schnell

Funding

MICHIGAN MEDICAL SCIENTIST TRAINING PROGRAMT32GM007863 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI COLLINS, KATHLEEN L. · 1985 to 2024
$38.3M
TRAINING PROGRAM IN ORGANOGENESIST32HD007505 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI PASCA DI MAGLIANO, MARINA, SPENCE, JASON · 1997 to 2021
$6.9M
Morphogenesis of the fetal intestinal epitheliumR01DK089933 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI GUMUCIO, DEBORAH L. · 2011 to 2019
$3.6M
Mechanisms of Gastric Mucosal Transformation in Hip1r-Deficient MiceR01DK078927 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI SAMUELSON, LINDA C. · 2008 to 2012
$1.6M
Notch Pathway Regulation of Intestinal Epithelial Cell HomeostasisR01DK096972 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI SAMUELSON, LINDA C. · 2013 to 2016
$1.3M
Notch Signaling Regulates Generation of Progenitors from Intestinal Stem CellsF30DK095517 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI CARULLI, ALEXIS · 2012 to 2014
$76k
TGF-B GROWTH FACTORS IN LIMB CHONDROGENESISF32HD007515 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT SCH OF MED/DNT · PI ROARK, EILEEN F · 1991 to 1992
–
NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD007505NICHD NIH HHS T32-HD007515NIDDK NIH HHS F30 DK095517NIDDK NIH HHS F30-DK095517NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK078927NIDDK NIH HHS R01-DK078927NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK089933NIDDK NIH HHS R01-DK089933NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK096972NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007863NIGMS NIH HHS T32-GM07863
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The definition, regulation and function of intestinal stem cells (ISCs) has been hotly debated. Recent discoveries have started to clarify the nature of ISCs, but many questions remain. This review discusses the current advances and controversies of ISC biology as well as theoretical compartmental models that have been coupled with in vivo experimentation to investigate the mechanisms of ISC dynamics during homeostasis, tumorigenesis, repair and development. We conclude our review by discussing the key lingering questions in the field and proposing how many of these questions can be addressed using both compartmental models and experimental techniques.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalAdult Stem CellsAnimalsBiomarkersCarcinogenesisCell DifferentiationHomeostasisHumansIntestinesPaneth CellsStem Cell NicheBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID24480852
PMCPMC4007491

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.