Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24480531›Full record

ArticleJournal of pain and symptom management2014

Nurse and physician barriers to spiritual care provision at the end of life.

Michael J Balboni, Adam Sullivan, Andrea C Enzinger, Zachary D Epstein-Peterson, Yolanda D Tseng, Christine Mitchell, Joshua Niska, Angelika Zollfrank, Tyler J VanderWeele, Tracy A Balboni

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pain and symptom management, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 87 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
87citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

87 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article

27 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Michael J BalboniHarvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Center for Psychosocial Epidemiology and Outcomes Research, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; McGraw/Patterson Center for Population Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Department of Psychiatry, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. Electronic address: Michael_Balboni@dfci.harvard.edu.
Adam SullivanDepartment of Biostatistics, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Andrea C EnzingerDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Center for Psychosocial Epidemiology and Outcomes Research, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; McGraw/Patterson Center for Population Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Zachary D Epstein-PetersonHarvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Yolanda D TsengDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Harvard Radiation Oncology Program, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Christine MitchellDepartment of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Joshua NiskaHarvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Angelika ZollfrankDepartment of Chaplaincy, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Tyler J VanderWeeleDepartment of Biostatistics, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Department of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Tracy A BalboniHarvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Center for Psychosocial Epidemiology and Outcomes Research, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; McGraw/Patterson Center for Population Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Funding

Physician Scientist Training in Cancer ResearchT32CA009172 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE · PI Jennifer R Brown, James A. DeCaprio · 1985 to 2026
$17.1M
NCI NIH HHS T32 CA009172
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextSpiritual care (SC) from medical practitioners is infrequent at the end of life (EOL) despite national standards.

objectivesThe study aimed to describe nurses' and physicians' desire to provide SC to terminally ill patients and assess 11 potential SC barriers.

methodsThis was a survey-based, multisite study conducted from October 2008 through January 2009. All eligible oncology nurses and physicians at four Boston academic centers were approached for study participation; 339 nurses and physicians participated (response rate=63%).

resultsMost nurses and physicians desire to provide SC within the setting of terminal illness (74% vs. 60%, respectively; P=0.002); however, 40% of nurses/physicians provide SC less often than they desire. The most highly endorsed barriers were "lack of private space" for nurses and "lack of time" for physicians, but neither was associated with actual SC provision. Barriers that predicted less frequent SC for all medical professionals included inadequate training (nurses: odds ratio [OR]=0.28, 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.12-0.73, P=0.01; physicians: OR=0.49, 95% CI=0.25-0.95, P=0.04), "not my professional role" (nurses: OR=0.21, 95% CI=0.07-0.61, P=0.004; physicians: OR=0.35, 95% CI=0.17-0.72, P=0.004), and "power inequity with patient" (nurses: OR=0.33, 95% CI=0.12-0.87, P=0.03; physicians: OR=0.41, 95% CI=0.21-0.78, P=0.007). A minority of nurses and physicians (21% and 49%, P=0.003, respectively) did not desire SC training. Those less likely to desire SC training reported lower self-ratings of spirituality (nurses: OR=5.00, 95% CI=1.82-12.50, P=0.002; physicians: OR=3.33, 95% CI=1.82-5.88, P<0.001) and male gender (physicians: OR=3.03, 95% CI=1.67-5.56, P<0.001).

conclusionSC training is suggested to be critical to the provision of SC in accordance with national care quality standards.

Indexed as

SpiritualityTerminal CareAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsNurse-Patient RelationsNursesPhysician-Patient RelationsPhysiciansSpiritualismhidden curriculumPalliative carereligionspiritual carespirituality

Identifiers

PMID24480531
PMCPMC4569089

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.