Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24479702›Full record

Trial reportTrials2014

CANABIC: CANnabis and Adolescents: effect of a Brief Intervention on their Consumption--study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Catherine Laporte, Hélène Vaillant-Roussel, Bruno Pereira, Olivier Blanc, Gilles Tanguy, Paul Frappé, David Costa, Yoann Gaboreau, Mélanie Badin, Laurent Marty and 5 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01433692 (Does a BI Conducted by General Practitioners Reduce Consumption of Canabis in 15 to 25 Years Old ?), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01433692 naunknown statusnot on this map

Does a BI Conducted by General Practitioners Reduce Consumption of Canabis in 15 to 25 Years Old ?

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospital, Clermont-FerrandRan2012 to 2014Enrolled750ConditionsAddictions, Adolescents, Primary Health Care, Brief InterventionArmsBrief Intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Psychosocial interventions for cannabis use disorder.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Catherine LaporteDepartment of General Medicine, Faculty of Medicine of Clermont-Ferrand, 28 Place Henri Dunant, 63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France. catherine.laporte@udamail.com.
Hélène Vaillant-Roussel
Bruno Pereira
Olivier Blanc
Gilles Tanguy
Paul Frappé
David Costa
Yoann Gaboreau
Mélanie Badin
Laurent Marty
Gilles Clément
Claude Dubray
Bruno Falissard
Pierre-Michel Llorca
Philippe Vorilhon
Université Clermont Auvergne · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Clermont-Ferrand · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montpellier · FRInserm · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCannabis is the most consumed illegal substance in France. General practitioners (GPs) are the health professionals who are most consulted by adolescents. Brief intervention (BI) is a promising care initiative for the consumption of cannabis, and could be a tool for GPs in caring for adolescents who consume cannabis. The aim of the CANABIC study is to measure the impact of a BI carried out by a GP on the consumption of cannabis by adolescents of 15 to 25 years of age.

methodsA randomized clustered controlled trial, stratified over three areas (Auvergne, Languedoc-Roussillon, and Rhône - Alpes), comparing an intervention group, which carries out the BI in consultation, and a control group, which ensures routine medical care. The main assessment criterion is the consumption of cannabis by amount of joints per month, at 12 months. The amount necessary to highlight a significant difference between the two groups of 30% of consumption at 12 months is 250 patients (50 GPs, 5 patients per GP; risk α = 5%; power = 90%; intra-cluster correlation coefficient ρ = 0.2; Hawthorne effect = 15%; lost to follow-up rates for GPs = 10% and for patients = 20%). This plan is replicated for the three areas, and therefore a total of 750 patients are expected.The secondary criteria for judgment are the associated consumption of tobacco and alcohol, the perception of the consequences of consumption, and the driving of a vehicle following consumption. DISCUSSION: Research about BI for young cannabis users is underway. The aim of the CANABIC study is to validate a BI suited to adolescents who consume cannabis, which may be performed in the general practice. This would provide a tool for their treatment by a GP, which could be widely distributed during initial or further medical training.

trial registrationCANABIC is a randomized clustered trial (NCT01433692, registered 2011 Sept 12), PHRC funded: Clinical Research Hospital Program (Governmental Fund, Health Ministry). Date first patient randomized: March 2012.

Indexed as

Adolescent BehaviorPsychotherapy, BriefResearch DesignAdolescentAdultAlcohol DrinkingAutomobile DrivingClinical ProtocolsFranceGeneral PracticeHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMarijuana AbuseMarijuana SmokingPerceptionTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID24479702
PMCPMC3917531
OpenAlexW2119280491

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.