Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24479488›Full record

ArticleBMC medical genomics2014

Integrative genomic analysis identifies epigenetic marks that mediate genetic risk for epithelial ovarian cancer.

Devin C Koestler, Prabhakar Chalise, Mine S Cicek, Julie M Cunningham, Sebastian Armasu, Melissa C Larson, Jeremy Chien, Matthew Block, Kimberly R Kalli, Thomas A Sellers and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical genomics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Observational
  3. Gene-based mediation analysis in epigenetic studies.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2021
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Cancer cell international · 2019
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Devin C Koestler
Prabhakar Chalise
Mine S Cicek
Julie M Cunningham
Sebastian Armasu
Melissa C Larson
Jeremy Chien
Matthew Block
Kimberly R Kalli
Thomas A Sellers
Brooke L FridleyDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Kansas Medical Center, 3901 Rainbow Blvd, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA. bfridley@kumc.edu.
Ellen L Goode
Mayo Clinic in Florida · USUniversity of Kansas Medical Center · USMayo Clinic in Arizona · USMoffitt Cancer Center · US

Funding

Women's Cancer ProgramP30CA015083 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI Felicity Enders · 1985 to 2026
$151.3M
Use of microfluidic tumor cultures to enable clinical trials of therapies for ovarian cancerP50CA136393 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI Zhenkun Lou · 2009 to 2026
$37.0M
Ovarian cancer GWAS discovery, expansion and replication (N2 - Project #1)U19CA148112 · NCI · H. LEE MOFFITT CANCER CTR & RES INST · PI SELLERS, THOMAS A · 2010 to 2014
$10.2M
Haplotype-Based Genome Screen for Ovarian Cancer LociR01CA114343 · NCI · H. LEE MOFFITT CANCER CTR & RES INST · PI SELLERS, THOMAS A · 2007 to 2011
$7.5M
Genetic Variation in the NF-kappaB Pathway and Ovarian Cancer EtiologyR01CA122443 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI GOODE, ELLEN L. · 2007 to 2012
$2.7M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA015083NCI NIH HHS P50 CA136393NCI NIH HHS R01 CA114343NCI NIH HHS R01 CA122443NCI NIH HHS U19 CA148112
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBoth genetic and epigenetic factors influence the development and progression of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). However, there is an incomplete understanding of the interrelationship between these factors and the extent to which they interact to impact disease risk. In the present study, we aimed to gain insight into this relationship by identifying DNA methylation marks that are candidate mediators of ovarian cancer genetic risk.

methodsWe used 214 cases and 214 age-matched controls from the Mayo Clinic Ovarian Cancer Study. Pretreatment, blood-derived DNA was profiled for genome-wide methylation (Illumina Infinium HumanMethylation27 BeadArray) and single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs, Illumina Infinium HD Human610-Quad BeadArray). The Causal Inference Test (CIT) was implemented to distinguish CpG sites that mediate genetic risk, from those that are consequential or independently acted on by genotype.

resultsControlling for the estimated distribution of immune cells and other key covariates, our initial epigenome-wide association analysis revealed 1,993 significantly differentially methylated CpGs that between cases and controls (FDR, q < 0.05). The relationship between methylation and case-control status for these 1,993 CpGs was found to be highly consistent with the results of previously published, independent study that consisted of peripheral blood DNA methylation signatures in 131 pretreatment cases and 274 controls. Implementation of the CIT test revealed 17 CpG/SNP pairs, comprising 13 unique CpGs and 17 unique SNPs, which represent potential methylation-mediated relationships between genotype and EOC risk. Of these 13 CpGs, several are associated with immune related genes and genes that have been previously shown to exhibit altered expression in the context of cancer.

conclusionsThese findings provide additional insight into EOC etiology and may serve as novel biomarkers for EOC susceptibility.

Indexed as

Epigenesis, GeneticGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenomicsAgedCarcinoma, Ovarian EpithelialCase-Control StudiesCpG IslandsDNA MethylationFemaleHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasms, Glandular and EpithelialOvarian NeoplasmsPolymorphism, Single Nucleotide

Identifiers

PMID24479488
PMCPMC3916313
OpenAlexW2161830927

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.