Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24479048›Full record

ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2013

An exploratory study on socio economic status scales in a rural and urban setting.

N R Ramesh Masthi, Gangaboraiah, Praveen Kulkarni

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. B.G. Prasad Socioeconomic Scale 2024: An Update Using Conventional Approach and Linear Regression Modelling.Indian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The Clinical-Audiological Cross Sectional Study of Deaf-Mute Patients in a Tertiary Care Centre of Uttarakhand State and Literature Review.Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Socioeconomic status and diabetic retinopathy in India.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2021
    Review
  11. Prevalence ofMiddle East journal of digestive diseases · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Updated BG Prasad's Socioeconomic Status Classification for the Year 2023.Indian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine
    Article
  18. "DIABETIC TAX" - Cost of Care among Persons with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in an Urban Underprivileged Area of Bengaluru.Indian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

N R Ramesh MasthiDepartment of Community Medicine, Kempegowda Institute of Medical Sciences, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
GangaboraiahDepartment of Community Medicine, Kempegowda Institute of Medical Sciences, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
Praveen KulkarniDepartment of Community Medicine, Kempegowda Institute of Medical Sciences, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere are many different scales to measure socioeconomic status (SES). The present study was conducted with the objective to compare the most commonly used SES in rural and urban setting. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis exploratory study was conducted in the rural and urban field practice area of a medical college situated in Bangalore for a period of 3 months between January and April 2010. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: To measure the agreement between the scales spearman's rank correlations was applied.

resultsA total of 120 families were included in the study. Among the 60 families surveyed at rural setting, it was observed that, majority 40 (67%) belonged to high class when the Standard of Living Index (SLI) scale was applied. Among the 60 families surveyed at urban setting, majority 30 (50%) belonged to high class when the SLI scale was applied.

conclusionsThe SLI scale gives a more accurate and realistic picture of the SES of the family and hence should be the scale recommended for classification of SES in urban and rural setting.

Indexed as

Modified Kupuswamy scalepareek scaleprasad scalesocioeconomic status scalestandard of living index

Identifiers

PMID24479048
PMCPMC3893998

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.