Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24478995›Full record

ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2012

Access to health services among slum dwellers in an industrial township and surrounding rural areas: a rapid epidemiological assessment.

Amitav Banerjee, J S Bhawalkar, S L Jadhav, Hetal Rathod, D T Khedkar

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Health-Care Services Utilization Among Diabetes Patients Enrolled in Tertiary Care Hospital of East Delhi.Indian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Amitav BanerjeeDepartment of Community Medicine, D Y Patil Medical College, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
J S BhawalkarDepartment of Community Medicine, D Y Patil Medical College, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
S L JadhavDepartment of Community Medicine, D Y Patil Medical College, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Hetal RathodDepartment of Community Medicine, D Y Patil Medical College, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
D T KhedkarDepartment of Community Medicine, D Y Patil Medical College, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Dr. D. Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextThe biggest challenge in implementing the primary health care principles is of equitable distribution of health care to all. The rural masses and urban slum dwellers are most vulnerable to lack of access to health care.

aimTo study access to health services among slum dwellers and rural population. SETTING AND

designA cross-sectional survey in an urban slum and surrounding rural areas in field practice area of a medical college. MATERIALS AND

methodsStructured instrument along with qualitative techniques such as focus group discussions, were used to collect information on access and utilization of health services from 865 individuals of both sexes and all ages selected from urban slums, villages, and indoor and outdoor patients. Access to basic determinants of good health such as housing, water, and sanitation was also elicited. Besides, health needs based on self-reported disease conditions were compiled.

resultsMore than 50% of respondents were living in poor housing and insanitary conditions. Besides the burden of communicable diseases and malnutrition (especially in children), risk of lifestyle diseases as evidenced by high Body mass index in 25% of adults surveyed was found. Private medical practitioners were more accessible than government facilities. More than 60% sought treatment from private medical facilities for their own ailments (for sickness in children this proportion was 74%). People who visited government facilities were more dissatisfied with the services (30.88%) than those who visited private facilities (18.31%). This difference was significant (OR=1.99, 95% confidence interval 1.40 to 2.88; χ(2) =15.95, df=1, P=0.007). The main barriers to health care identified were waiting time long, affordability, poor quality of care, distance, and attitude of health workers.

conclusionThe underprivileged in India continue to have poor access to basic determinants of good health as well as to curative services from government sources during illness.

Indexed as

Accessepidemiologicalhealthrapidutilization

Identifiers

PMID24478995
PMCPMC3893946
OpenAlexW2044431385

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.