Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24478754›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in neurology2014

Melodic intonation therapy: back to basics for future research.

Anna Zumbansen, Isabelle Peretz, Sylvie Hébert

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in neurology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06213376 (Intensive MIT Paired With Video Feedback for Motor Speech Disorders and Aphasia), which is not on this map. Cited by 31 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06213376 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Intensive MIT Paired With Video Feedback for Motor Speech Disorders and Aphasia

TypeinterventionalSponsorNevada State UniversityRan2023 to 2024Enrolled1ConditionsStroke, Aphasia, Motor SpeechArmsMelodic Intonation Therapy, Video Feedback Performance Review
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 106 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Neurorehabilitation Clinical Pathways in Stroke: The Padova Model.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Anna ZumbansenFaculty of Medicine, School of Speech Pathology and Audiology, Université de Montréal , Montréal, QC , Canada ; BRAMS, International Laboratory for Brain, Music and Sound Research, Université de Montréal , Montréal, QC , Canada.
Isabelle PeretzBRAMS, International Laboratory for Brain, Music and Sound Research, Université de Montréal , Montréal, QC , Canada ; Department of Psychology, Université de Montréal , Montréal, QC , Canada.
Sylvie HébertFaculty of Medicine, School of Speech Pathology and Audiology, Université de Montréal , Montréal, QC , Canada ; BRAMS, International Laboratory for Brain, Music and Sound Research, Université de Montréal , Montréal, QC , Canada.
International Laboratory for Brain, Music and Sound Research · CAUniversité de Montréal · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We present a critical review of the literature on melodic intonation therapy (MIT), one of the most formalized treatments used by speech-language therapist in Broca's aphasia. We suggest basic clarifications to enhance the scientific support of this promising treatment. First, therapeutic protocols using singing as a speech facilitation technique are not necessarily MIT. The goal of MIT is to restore propositional speech. The rationale is that patients can learn a new way to speak through singing by using language-capable regions of the right cerebral hemisphere. Eventually, patients are supposed to use this way of speaking permanently but not to sing overtly. We argue that many treatment programs covered in systematic reviews on MIT's efficacy do not match MIT's therapeutic goal and rationale. Critically, we identified two main variations of MIT: the French thérapie mélodique et rythmée (TMR) that trains patients to use singing overtly as a facilitation technique in case of speech struggle and palliative versions of MIT that help patients with the most severe expressive deficits produce a limited set of useful, readymade phrases. Second, we distinguish between the immediate effect of singing on speech production and the long-term effect of the entire program on language recovery. Many results in the MIT literature can be explained by this temporal perspective. Finally, we propose that MIT can be viewed as a treatment of apraxia of speech more than aphasia. This issue should be explored in future experimental studies.

Indexed as

aphasiaapraxia of speechmelodic intonation therapymusic therapyrehabilitationspeech disordersspeech therapytreatment

Identifiers

PMID24478754
PMCPMC3904283
OpenAlexW2019812715

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.