Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24478706›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in physiology2013

A comparative study of Whi5 and retinoblastoma proteins: from sequence and structure analysis to intracellular networks.

Md Mehedi Hasan, Stefania Brocca, Elena Sacco, Michela Spinelli, Elena Papaleo, Matteo Lambrughi, Lilia Alberghina, Marco Vanoni

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. The human retinoblastoma susceptibility gene (RB1): an evolutionary story in primates.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2017
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Md Mehedi HasanSYSBIO Centre for Systems Biology Milano, Italy ; Department of Biotechnology and Biosciences, University of Milano-Bicocca Milano, Italy.
Stefania BroccaSYSBIO Centre for Systems Biology Milano, Italy ; Department of Biotechnology and Biosciences, University of Milano-Bicocca Milano, Italy.
Elena SaccoSYSBIO Centre for Systems Biology Milano, Italy ; Department of Biotechnology and Biosciences, University of Milano-Bicocca Milano, Italy.
Michela SpinelliSYSBIO Centre for Systems Biology Milano, Italy ; Department of Biotechnology and Biosciences, University of Milano-Bicocca Milano, Italy.
Elena PapaleoDepartment of Biotechnology and Biosciences, University of Milano-Bicocca Milano, Italy.
Matteo LambrughiDepartment of Biotechnology and Biosciences, University of Milano-Bicocca Milano, Italy.
Lilia AlberghinaSYSBIO Centre for Systems Biology Milano, Italy ; Department of Biotechnology and Biosciences, University of Milano-Bicocca Milano, Italy.
Marco VanoniSYSBIO Centre for Systems Biology Milano, Italy ; Department of Biotechnology and Biosciences, University of Milano-Bicocca Milano, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cell growth and proliferation require a complex series of tight-regulated and well-orchestrated events. Accordingly, proteins governing such events are evolutionary conserved, even among distant organisms. By contrast, it is more singular the case of "core functions" exerted by functional analogous proteins that are not homologous and do not share any kind of structural similarity. This is the case of proteins regulating the G1/S transition in higher eukaryotes-i.e., the retinoblastoma (Rb) tumor suppressor Rb-and budding yeast, i.e., Whi5. The interaction landscape of Rb and Whi5 is quite large, with more than one hundred proteins interacting either genetically or physically with each protein. The Whi5 interactome has been used to construct a concept map of Whi5 function and regulation. Comparison of physical and genetic interactors of Rb and Whi5 allows highlighting a significant core of conserved, common functionalities associated with the interactors indicating that structure and function of the network-rather than individual proteins-are conserved during evolution. A combined bioinformatics and biochemical approach has shown that the whole Whi5 protein is highly disordered, except for a small region containing the protein family signature. The comparison with Whi5 homologs from Saccharomycetales has prompted the hypothesis of a modular organization of structural disorder, with most evolutionary conserved regions alternating with highly variable ones. The finding of a consensus sequence points to the conservation of a specific phosphorylation rhythm along with two disordered sequence motifs, probably acting as phosphorylation-dependent seeds in Whi5 folding/unfolding. Thus, the widely disordered Whi5 appears to act as a hierarchical, "date hub" that has evolutionary assayed an original way of modular organization before being supplanted by the globular, multi-domain structured Rb, more suitable to cover the role of a "party hub".

Indexed as

cell cycledate hubmultisite phosphorylationparty hubprotein evolutionprotein hubstructural disordersystems biology

Identifiers

PMID24478706
PMCPMC3897220

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.