Data and model tango to aid the understanding of astrocyte-neuron signaling.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Analysis of Network Models with Neuron-Astrocyte Interactions.Neuroinformatics · 2023
   Article
2. Computational Models for Calcium-Mediated Astrocyte Functions.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2018
   Review
3. Challenges in Reproducibility, Replicability, and Comparability of Computational Models and Tools for Neuronal and Glial Networks, Cells, and Subcellular Structures.Frontiers in neuroinformatics · 2018
   Article
4. Reproducibility and Comparability of Computational Models for Astrocyte Calcium Excitability.Frontiers in neuroinformatics · 2017
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as