A call for an open, informed study of all aspects of consciousness.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Methodological Exclusion of the Transcendent? Implications for Theory and Research in Religion, Spirituality and Health.Journal of religion and health · 2024
   Article
2. Cognitive styles and psi: psi researchers are more similar to skeptics than to lay believers.Frontiers in psychology · 2024
   Article
3. Inner Experience - Direct Access to Reality: A Complementarist Ontology and Dual Aspect Monism Support a Broader Epistemology.Frontiers in psychology · 2020
   Article
4. Future directions in precognition research: more research can bridge the gap between skeptics and proponents.Frontiers in psychology · 2014
   Article
5. Near-death experiences. The Mind-body debate & the nature of reality.Missouri medicine
   Article
6. Near-Death Experiences: The Last Word.Missouri medicine
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as