Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24478681›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2014

Short-term retention of relational memory in amnesia revisited: accurate performance depends on hippocampal integrity.

Lydia T S Yee, Deborah E Hannula, Daniel Tranel, Neal J Cohen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Medial temporal lobe coding of item and spatial information during relational binding in working memory.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2014
    Trial
  2. Differential Coding of Associative Memory Information in the Macaque Lateral Prefrontal Cortex and Hippocampus.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Conscious and unconscious memory systems.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2015
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lydia T S YeeFaculty of Medicine, Institute of Cognitive Neurology and Dementia Research, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg Magdeburg, Germany.
Deborah E HannulaDepartment of Psychology, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Milwaukee, WI, USA.
Daniel TranelDepartments of Neurology and Psychology, University of Iowa Iowa City, IA, USA.
Neal J CohenDepartment of Psychology and Beckman Institute for Advanced Science and Technology, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, IL, USA.

Funding

THE NEUROANATOMICAL ORGANIZATION OF AUDITORY-RELATED CORTICES IN THE MONKEYP01NS019632 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI ADOLPHS, RALPH · 1985 to 2007
$9.1M
The Hippocampal System and Relational(Declarative) Memory ProcessesR01MH062500 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI COHEN, NEAL J. · 2002 to 2015
$5.8M
Drug Abuse, Social Decision-Making, and Sex-Related Functional Brain AsymmetryR01DA022549 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI TRANEL, DANIEL T. · 2006 to 2010
$1.7M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA022549NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH062500NINDS NIH HHS P01 NS019632
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traditionally, it has been proposed that the hippocampus and adjacent medial temporal lobe cortical structures are selectively critical for long-term declarative memory, which entails memory for inter-item and item-context relationships. Whether the hippocampus might also contribute to short-term retention of relational memory representations has remained controversial. In two experiments, we revisit this question by testing memory for relationships among items embedded in scenes using a standard working memory trial structure in which a sample stimulus is followed by a brief delay and the corresponding test stimulus. In each experimental block, eight trials using different exemplars of the same scene were presented. The exemplars contained the same items but with different spatial relationships among them. By repeating the pictures across trials, any potential contributions of item or scene memory to performance were minimized, and relational memory could be assessed more directly than has been done previously. When test displays were presented, participants indicated whether any of the item-location relationships had changed. Then, regardless of their responses (and whether any item did change its location), participants indicated on a forced-choice test, which item might have moved, guessing if necessary. Amnesic patients were impaired on the change detection test, and were frequently unable to specify the change after having reported correctly that a change had taken place. Comparison participants, by contrast, frequently identified the change even when they failed to report the mismatch, an outcome that speaks to the sensitivity of the change specification measure. These results confirm past reports of hippocampal contributions to short-term retention of relational memory representations, and suggest that the role of the hippocampus in memory has more to do with relational memory requirements than the length of a retention interval.

Indexed as

amnesiadelayed recognitionhippocampusrelational memoryshort-term memory

Identifiers

PMID24478681
PMCPMC3901041

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.