Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24478485›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2014

Circulating Mycobacterium bovis peptides and host response proteins as biomarkers for unambiguous detection of subclinical infection.

Elise A Lamont, Harish K Janagama, Joao Ribeiro-Lima, Lucy Vulchanova, Meetu Seth, My Yang, Kiran Kurmi, W Ray Waters, Tyler Thacker, Srinand Sreevatsan

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. An ELISA test using a circulatingFrontiers in veterinary science · 2024
    Article
  3. Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Extraction and Separation of Mycobacterial Proteins.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2021
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Comparative Proteomics Analysis of Human Macrophages Infected with VirulentFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2017
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Elise A LamontDepartment of Veterinary Population Medicine, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA.
Harish K Janagama
Joao Ribeiro-Lima
Lucy Vulchanova
Meetu Seth
My Yang
Kiran Kurmi
W Ray Waters
Tyler Thacker
Srinand Sreevatsan
University of Minnesota · USNational Animal Disease Center · USTexas A&M Health Science Center · USUnited States Department of Agriculture · USUniversity of Massachusetts Chan Medical School · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bovine tuberculosis remains one of the most damaging diseases to agriculture, and there is also a concern for human spillover. A critical need exists for rapid, thorough, and inexpensive diagnostic methods capable of detecting and differentiating Mycobacterium bovis infection from other pathogenic and environmental mycobacteria at multiple surveillance levels. In a previous study, Seth et al. (PLoS One 4:e5478, 2009, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0005478) identified 32 host peptides that specifically increased in the blood serum of M. bovis-infected animals). In the current study, 16 M. bovis proteins were discovered in the blood serum proteomics data sets. A large-scale validation analysis was undertaken for selected host and M. bovis proteins using a cattle serum repository containing M. bovis (n = 128), Mycobacterium kansasii (n = 10), and Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis (n = 10), cases exposed to M. bovis (n = 424), and negative controls (n = 38). Of the host biomarkers, vitamin D binding protein (VDBP) showed the greatest sensitivity and specificity for M. bovis detection. Circulating M. bovis proteins, specifically polyketide synthetase 5, detected M. bovis-infected cattle with little to no seroreactivity against M. kansasii- and M. avium subsp. paratuberculosis-infected animals. These data indicate that host and pathogen serum proteins can serve as reliable biomarkers for tracking M. bovis infection in animal populations.

Indexed as

AnimalsBacterial ProteinsBiomarkersBlood Chemical AnalysisCattleClinical Laboratory TechniquesLatent TuberculosisMycobacterium bovisPeptidesProteomeSensitivity and SpecificityTuberculosis, BovineVeterinary MedicineVitamin D-Binding ProteinBacterial ProteinsBiomarkersPeptidesProteomeVitamin D-Binding Protein

Identifiers

PMID24478485
PMCPMC3911325
OpenAlexW2164788697

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.