ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2014
Copy numbers of telomeric repeat sequences of human herpesvirus 6B in clinical isolates: possibility of mixed infections.
Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Laboratory and clinical aspects of human herpesvirus 6 infections.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In order to determine whether mixed infections of human herpesvirus 6B (HHV-6B) occur in immunocompetent and immunocompromised individuals, we examined the copy numbers of telomeric repeat sequences (TRS) of clinical isolates. In clinical isolates obtained from patients with exanthem subitum caused by primary HHV-6B infection, PCR products with HHV-6B TRS ranging between 400 and 800 bp were amplified. PCR products of various sizes were amplified in four clinical isolates from drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome (DIHS) patients and 15 isolates from hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients with HHV-6B reactivation. Based on the sequence analysis of the PCR products, the copy numbers of TRS in DIHS and HSCT patients were between 42 and 82 and 22 and >90, respectively. For two of the HSCT recipients, HHV-6B TRS PCR products of different sizes were detected in several isolates from each patient, which suggests mixed HHV-6B infections. In two of the posttransplant HHV-6B encephalitis patients, the sizes of the TRS nested PCR products amplified from the reactivated virus detected in the central nervous system differed from those of the virus detected in initial isolates from peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Taken together, these results suggest that PCR analysis of TRS copy number is a reliable tool for the discrimination of HHV-6B clinical isolates. Additionally, mixed HHV-6B infections occurred in HSCT recipients, and in some cases, compartmentalization of the HHV-6B strains to the central nervous system versus the blood compartment occurred in posttransplant HHV-6B encephalitis patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.