Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24478363›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2014

Differential associative training enhances olfactory acuity in Drosophila melanogaster.

Jonas Barth, Shubham Dipt, Ulrike Pech, Moritz Hermann, Thomas Riemensperger, André Fiala

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Cognitive limits of larvalLearning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.) · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Pairing-Dependent Plasticity in a Dissected Fly Brain Is Input-Specific and Requires Synaptic CaMKII Enrichment and Nighttime Sleep.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  6. Review
  7. A Markerless Pose Estimator Applicable to Limbless Animals.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Dopamine Receptor Dop1R2 Stabilizes Appetitive Olfactory Memory through the Raf/MAPK Pathway inThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2020
    Article
  13. One-trial learning in larvalLearning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.) · 2019
    Article
  14. Reinforcement signaling of punishment versus relief in fruit flies.Learning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.) · 2018
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jonas BarthGeorg-August-University Göttingen, Johann-Friedrich-Blumenbach-Institute for Zoology and Anthropology, Molecular Neurobiology of Behavior, 37077 Göttingen, Germany.
Shubham Dipt
Ulrike Pech
Moritz Hermann
Thomas Riemensperger
André Fiala

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Training can improve the ability to discriminate between similar, confusable stimuli, including odors. One possibility of enhancing behaviorally expressed discrimination (i.e., sensory acuity) relies on differential associative learning, during which animals are forced to detect the differences between similar stimuli. Drosophila represents a key model organism for analyzing neuronal mechanisms underlying both odor processing and olfactory learning. However, the ability of flies to enhance fine discrimination between similar odors through differential associative learning has not been analyzed in detail. We performed associative conditioning experiments using chemically similar odorants that we show to evoke overlapping neuronal activity in the fly's antennal lobes and highly correlated activity in mushroom body lobes. We compared the animals' performance in discriminating between these odors after subjecting them to one of two types of training: either absolute conditioning, in which only one odor is reinforced, or differential conditioning, in which one odor is reinforced and a second odor is explicitly not reinforced. First, we show that differential conditioning decreases behavioral generalization of similar odorants in a choice situation. Second, we demonstrate that this learned enhancement in olfactory acuity relies on both conditioned excitation and conditioned inhibition. Third, inhibitory local interneurons in the antennal lobes are shown to be required for behavioral fine discrimination between the two similar odors. Fourth, differential, but not absolute, training causes decorrelation of odor representations in the mushroom body. In conclusion, differential training with similar odors ultimately induces a behaviorally expressed contrast enhancement between the two similar stimuli that facilitates fine discrimination.

Indexed as

Analysis of VarianceAnimalsAnimals, Genetically ModifiedAssociation LearningAvoidance LearningCalciumConditioning, ClassicalDiscrimination, PsychologicalDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsFemaleGeneralization, PsychologicalGreen Fluorescent ProteinsMaleMovementOdorantsCalciumDrosophila ProteinsGreen Fluorescent Proteinsassociative learningDrosophila melanogasterodor discriminationolfactionoptical calcium imagingsensory processing

Identifiers

PMID24478363
PMCPMC6827587

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.