Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24478335›Full record

ArticleGenetics2014

Highly specific and efficient CRISPR/Cas9-catalyzed homology-directed repair in Drosophila.

Scott J Gratz, Fiona P Ukken, C Dustin Rubinstein, Gene Thiede, Laura K Donohue, Alexander M Cummings, Kate M O'Connor-Giles

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 595 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
595citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

595 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Heterotypic intercellular adhesion tunes efficiency of cell-on-cell migration.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. eLife · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Single nucleotide variants inBiochemistry and biophysics reports · 2026
    Article

535 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Scott J GratzGenetics Training Program, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53706.
Fiona P Ukken
C Dustin Rubinstein
Gene Thiede
Laura K Donohue
Alexander M Cummings
Kate M O'Connor-Giles

Funding

PREDOCTORAL TRAINING PROGRAM IN GENETICST32GM007133 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI PERNA, NICOLE T · 1985 to 2023
$16.5M
Molecular mechanisms of synapse assembly and functionR01NS078179 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI O'CONNOR-GILES, KATHALEEN M · 2013 to 2023
$3.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007133NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS078179
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We and others recently demonstrated that the readily programmable CRISPR/Cas9 system can be used to edit the Drosophila genome. However, most applications to date have relied on aberrant DNA repair to stochastically generate frameshifting indels and adoption has been limited by a lack of tools for efficient identification of targeted events. Here we report optimized tools and techniques for expanded application of the CRISPR/Cas9 system in Drosophila through homology-directed repair (HDR) with double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) donor templates that facilitate complex genome engineering through the precise incorporation of large DNA sequences, including screenable markers. Using these donors, we demonstrate the replacement of a gene with exogenous sequences and the generation of a conditional allele. To optimize efficiency and specificity, we generated transgenic flies that express Cas9 in the germline and directly compared HDR and off-target cleavage rates of different approaches for delivering CRISPR components. We also investigated HDR efficiency in a mutant background previously demonstrated to bias DNA repair toward HDR. Finally, we developed a web-based tool that identifies CRISPR target sites and evaluates their potential for off-target cleavage using empirically rooted rules. Overall, we have found that injection of a dsDNA donor and guide RNA-encoding plasmids into vasa-Cas9 flies yields the highest efficiency HDR and that target sites can be selected to avoid off-target mutations. Efficient and specific CRISPR/Cas9-mediated HDR opens the door to a broad array of complex genome modifications and greatly expands the utility of CRISPR technology for Drosophila research.

Indexed as

CRISPR-Cas SystemsRecombinational DNA RepairAnimalsAnimals, Genetically ModifiedBacterial ProteinsCRISPR-Associated Protein 9CRISPR-Associated ProteinsDEAD-box RNA HelicasesDNADrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsEndonucleasesFemaleGene EditingGerm CellsMaleBacterial ProteinsCas9 endonuclease Streptococcus pyogenesCRISPR-Associated Protein 9CRISPR-Associated ProteinsDEAD-box RNA HelicasesDNADrosophila ProteinsEndonucleasesRNA, Guide, CRISPR-Cas Systemsvas protein, DrosophilaCas9CRISPR RNADrosophilagenome engineeringhomologous recombination

Identifiers

PMID24478335
PMCPMC3982687

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.