Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24478278›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Royal Society, Interface2014

Nonlinear light-sheet fluorescence microscopy by photobleaching imprinting.

Liang Gao, Liren Zhu, Chiye Li, Lihong V Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Royal Society, Interface, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Liang GaoOptical Imaging Laboratory, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Washington University, , St Louis, MO 63130, USA.
Liren Zhu
Chiye Li
Lihong V Wang

Funding

Task Specific Project 3: Diffuse Optical TomographyU54CA136398 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI WANG, LIHONG · 2008 to 2012
$6.0M
PHOTON TUNNELING: SHEDDING NEW LIGHT ON BIOMEDICINEDP1EB016986 · NIBIB · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI WANG, LIHONG · 2012 to 2016
$3.8M
PHOTOACOUSTIC MICROSCOPY OF NEOVASCULARIZATION IN RENAL CANCER GROWTH AND THERAPYR01CA159959 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI ARBEIT, JEFFREY MICHAEL · 2011 to 2015
$2.9M
Monitoring of Breast Neoadjuvant Therapy by Thermo- and Photo- Acoustic TomographR01CA134539 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI MONSEES, BARBARA, WANG, LIHONG · 2009 to 2013
$2.9M
Photoacoustic endoscopy of Barretts esophagusR01CA157277 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI MEYERS, BRYAN F, ZHOU, QIFA · 2010 to 2014
$2.7M
RECOVERY OF OPTICAL ABSORPTION COEFFICIENT IN QUANTITATIVE PHOTOACOUSTIC IMAGINGR01EB008085 · NIBIB · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI WANG, LIHONG · 2008 to 2011
$2.4M
NCCDPHP CDC HHS DP1 EB016986NCI NIH HHS R01 CA134539NCI NIH HHS R01 CA157277NCI NIH HHS R01 CA159959NCI NIH HHS U54 CA136398NIBIB NIH HHS DP1 EB016986NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB008085
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We present a nonlinear light-sheet fluorescence microscopy (LSFM) scheme based on photobleaching imprinting. By measuring photobleaching-induced fluorescence decay, our method simultaneously achieves a large imaging field of view and a thin optical section. Furthermore, the scattered-light-induced background is significantly reduced, considerably improving image contrast. Our method is expected to expand the application field of LSFM into the optical quasi-ballistic regime, enabling studies on non-transparent biological samples.

Indexed as

Models, TheoreticalPhotobleachingAnimalsMicroscopy, FluorescenceZebrafishlight-sheet fluorescence microscopynonlinear microscopyphotobleaching

Identifiers

PMID24478278
PMCPMC3928927

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.