Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24478068›Full record

ArticleInfection and immunity2014

Protection from Clostridium difficile infection in CD4 T Cell- and polymeric immunoglobulin receptor-deficient mice.

Pehga F Johnston, Dale N Gerding, Katherine L Knight

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Infection and immunity, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. A Mouse Model of MildMicroorganisms · 2024
    Article
  6. Reviewing theMicroorganisms · 2024
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Microbiology (Reading, England) · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Pehga F JohnstonLoyola University Chicago Stritch School of Medicine, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Maywood, Illinois, USA.
Dale N Gerding
Katherine L Knight
Loyola University Chicago · USEdward Hines, Jr. VA Hospital · US

Funding

Somatic Diversification of Immunoglobulin Genes in GALTR01AI050260 · NIAID · LOYOLA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO · PI KNIGHT, KATHERINE L. · 2001 to 2015
$5.1M
NIAID NIH HHS AI50260NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI050260
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clostridium difficile rivals methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus as the primary hospital-acquired infection. C. difficile infection (CDI) caused by toxins A and/or B can manifest as mild diarrhea to life-threatening pseudomembranous colitis. Although most patients recover fully from CDI, ~20% undergo recurrent disease. Several studies have demonstrated a correlation between anti-toxin antibody (Ab) and decreased recurrence; however, the contributions of the systemic and mucosal Ab responses remain unclear. Our goal was to use the CDI mouse model to characterize the protective immune response to C. difficile. C57BL/6 mice infected with epidemic C. difficile strain BI17 developed protective immunity against CDI and did not develop CDI upon rechallenge; they generated systemic IgG and IgA as well as mucosal IgA Ab to toxin. To determine if protective immunity to C. difficile could be generated in immunodeficient individuals, we infected CD4(-/-) mice and found that they generated both mucosal and serum IgA anti-toxin Abs and were protected from CDI upon rechallenge, with protection dependent on major histocompatibility complex class II (MHCII) expression; no IgG anti-toxin Ab was found. We found that protection was likely due to neutralizing mucosal IgA Ab. In contrast, pIgR(-/-) mice, which lack the receptor to transcytose polymeric Ab across the epithelium, were also protected from CDI, suggesting that although mucosal anti-toxin Ab may contribute to protection, it is not required. We conclude that protection from CDI can occur by several mechanisms and that the mechanism of protection is determined by the state of immunocompetence of the host.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodies, BacterialCD4-Positive T-LymphocytesClostridioides difficileClostridium InfectionsDisease Models, AnimalImmunoglobulin AImmunoglobulin GMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMice, KnockoutReceptors, Polymeric ImmunoglobulinAntibodies, BacterialImmunoglobulin AImmunoglobulin GReceptors, Polymeric Immunoglobulin

Identifiers

PMID24478068
PMCPMC3911374
OpenAlexW2144974013

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.