Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24478048›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical laboratory analysis2014

Comparison between screening and confirmatory serological assays in blood donors in a region of South Italy.

Linda Sommese, Carmela Iannone, Francesco Cacciatore, Gustavo De Iorio, Claudio Napoli

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical laboratory analysis, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Recommendations on hepatitis C screening for adults.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2017
    Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Linda SommeseU.O.C. Immunohematology, Transfusion Medicine and Transplant Immunology (SIMT), Azienda Universitaria Policlinico (AOU), Second University of Naples, Italy.
Carmela Iannone
Francesco Cacciatore
Gustavo De Iorio
Claudio Napoli
Fondazione Salvatore Maugeri · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundScreening assays are needed in order to guarantee safety of donated blood, but a significant number of safe donations are removed from blood supply because of reactive screening results. It is important to evaluate the positive predictive value (PPV) of screening assays in order to modulate confirmatory algorithm and implement an adequate counseling.

methodsAn analysis of 17,912 blood donations has been conducted at Transfusion Medicine at Second University Naples, Italy, in 2009-2012. Serological screening for syphilis, hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus (HCV), and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) was performed by ARCHITECT (Abbott Diagnostics, Wiesbaden, Germany); repeatedly reactive (RR) samples were checked by respective confirmatory tests. The relationship between sample/cutoff and confirmed seropositivity were analyzed.

resultsRR rates were low as expected in blood donors: 0.47% for syphilis, 0.42% for HBV, 0.50% for HCV, and 0.15% for HIV. The specificity on RR + gray zone (GZ) was 99.67%, 99.79%, 99.77%, and 99.88%, respectively; due to the low prevalence, PPV value was 30.6% for syphilis, 50.7% for HBV, 42.2% for HCV, and 18.5% for HIV. These values increased substantially reaching a plateau of 89.3% for syphilis, 94.6% for HBV, 85.7% for HCV, and 100% for HIV at the threshold established by receiver operating characteristics curve analysis.

conclusionsSupplemental testing on samples with high signal by screening assays seems to add little information. GZ settings and confirmatory testing for positive screening results should be designed taking in account several factors, including difference in the natural history among blood-borne infections, the characteristics of first- and second-level tests, and, when available, the results of nucleic acid amplification testing.

Indexed as

Blood-Borne PathogensBlood DonorsMandatory TestingAlgorithmsBlood TransfusionHepatitis BHepatitis CHIV InfectionsHumansItalySerologic TestsSyphilisblood screeningCMIAconfirmatory assaysNATtransfusion-transmitted infections

Identifiers

PMID24478048
PMCPMC6807438
OpenAlexW1708112006

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.