Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24477880›Full record

ArticleDer Urologe. Ausg. A2014

[Follow-up care - consequences of urinary diversion after bladder cancer].

S Degener, S Roth, M J Mathers, B Ubrig

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Der Urologe. Ausg. A, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

S DegenerKlinik für Urologie und Kinderurologie, Helios Klinikum Wuppertal, Zentrum für Forschung in der klinischen Medizin (ZFKM), Universität Witten/Herdecke, Heusnerstr. 40, 42283, Wuppertal, Deutschland, stephan.degener@helios-kliniken.de.
S Roth
M J Mathers
B Ubrig

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Radical cystectomy is the standard of care for muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Continent urinary diversions utilizing both small and large bowel are becoming more prominent: therefore, the postoperative follow-up has to focus on different aspects. In the first instance after radical cystectomy functional issues with respect to potential stenosis, post-void residual urine and micturition disorders are important. In the early phase the oncological follow-up aims to detect local, urethral and systemic recurrences and new data show the importance of the first 3 years after surgery. Long-term follow-up focuses on metabolic aspects, such as cobalamin or bile acid deficits, acidosis and disorders of calcium and bone metabolism. Follow-up care should consider specific complications of different types of urinary diversions; however to date standardized follow-up guidelines are lacking.

Indexed as

HumansPostoperative CareUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsUrinary DiversionUrinary Incontinence

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.