ArticleHerz2014
[Lung transplantation].
Article in Herz, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lung transplantation is a therapeutic option for patients with end-stage lung diseases. Selection of candidates requires careful consideration of the disease-specific indications and contraindications for transplantation. Advances have been made in candidate selection via the ability to prognosticate outcomes of various lung diseases and through the implementation of the lung allocation score (LAS) with specific consideration of the degree of urgency and good postoperative survival rate, after neglecting the waiting time. This system has resulted in decreased mortality on the waiting list for lung transplantation. The availability of donor organs can possibly be increased by implementation of ex vivo lung perfusion as an alternative to conventional organ preservation. Risk factors for poor outcomes post-lung transplantation have been identified and understanding of the physiological, cellular and molecular mechanisms responsible for lung and airway damage has been extensively expanded. Primary graft dysfunction, infectious diseases, acute rejection, antibody-mediated rejection, lymphocytic bronchiolitis, obliterative bronchiolitis, restrictive allograft syndrome, and chronic lung allograft dysfunction are well defined complications and continue to be common causes of morbidity and mortality. This article provides a comprehensive update on these topics for the non-transplantation clinician.
Indexed as
Identifiers
24477632What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.