Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24477621›Full record

ReviewJournal of neuro-oncology2014

Personal health records as portal to the electronic medical record.

Jennifer E Cahill, Mark R Gilbert, Terri S Armstrong

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02970461 (Gamifying Patient's Personal Data Validation and Completion in a Personal Health Record), which is not on this map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02970461 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2016, after this paper: background citation

Gamifying Patient's Personal Data Validation and Completion in a Personal Health Record

TypeinterventionalSponsorHospital Italiano de Buenos AiresRan2016 to 2016Enrolled40,000ConditionsChronic DiseaseArmsGamified Group, Control Group
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Personal Health Records: A Systematic Literature Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2017
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Adoption of Electronic Personal Health Records in Canada: Perceptions of Stakeholders.International journal of health policy and management · 2016
    Article
  12. Electronic Health Records: Then, Now, and in the Future.Yearbook of medical informatics · 2016
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. VA OpenNotes: exploring the experiences of early patient adopters with access to clinical notes.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jennifer E CahillDepartment of Family Health, University of Texas School of Nursing at Houston, 6901 Bertner Ave, Houston, TX, 77030, USA, jecahill@partners.org.
Mark R Gilbert
Terri S Armstrong

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This topic review discusses the evolving clinical challenges associated with the implementation of electronic personal health records (PHR) that are fully integrated with electronic medical records (EMR). The benefits of facilitating patient access to the EMR through web-based, PHR-portals may be substantial; foremost is the potential to enhance the flow of information between patient and healthcare practitioner. The benefits of improved communication and transparency of care are presumed to be a reduction in clinical errors, increased quality of care, better patient-management of disease, and better disease and symptom comprehension. Yet PHR databases allow patients open access to newly-acquired clinical data without the benefit of concurrent expert clinical interpretation, and therefore may create the potential for greater patient distress and uncertainty. With specific attention to neuro-oncology patients, this review focuses on the developing conflicts and consequences associated with the use of a PHR that parallels data acquisition of the EMR in real-time. We conclude with a discussion of recommendations for implementing fully-integrated PHR for neuro-oncology patients.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsHealth Records, PersonalCommunicationDelivery of Health CareHealth Information ManagementHumansInternetMedical OncologyNeurologyPatient Access to RecordsPatient Preference

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.