ArticleJournal of neurology2014
Unusual features of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease followed-up in a memory clinic.
Article in Journal of neurology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease presenting as psychiatric disorder: case presentation and systematic review.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Review
- Article
- The language disorder of prion disease is characteristic of a dynamic aphasia and is rarely an isolated clinical feature.PloS one · 2018Article
- Biomarkers for sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (sCJD) generally manifests itself by cognitive or rapidly progressive motor symptoms. An atypical onset or an unusual evolution may delay the diagnosis. Among patients with a confirmed diagnosis of sCJD following a post-mortem neuropathological examination at the Neuropathology Centre of Lille, France, those who had presented with atypical cognitive disorders at onset were included in the study. Four patients were included. The first patient (64-years-old) presented early language disorders, later accompanied by apathy and behavioral disorders. The prolonged course suggested a diagnosis of progressive primary aphasia. The second patient (68-years-old) presented with aphasia, apraxia, and ataxia of the right upper limb with parkinsonian syndrome, suggesting corticobasal degeneration. In the two last patients (58- and 61-years-old), the onset was marked by an anxiety-depression syndrome, falls, visual hallucinations, extra-pyramidal syndrome, and fluctuating cognitive decline. The diagnosis raised was probable Lewy body dementia. The 14.3.3 protein was found in two of the four cases. The clinical elements found may initially suggest focal atrophy or Lewy body dementia. A very rapid clinical deterioration generally suggests sCJD, but in the last case, the evolution was particularly slow. The diagnosis of sCJD must be considered in cases of rapid-onset dementia, even if all of the clinical criteria are not present. The detection of the 14.3.3 protein and multifold increase in total-Tau with normal or slightly increased phosphorylated-Tau in the CSF are additional arguments to reinforce the diagnosis. The post-mortem neuropathological examination is important to confirm the diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.