Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24477388›Full record

ReviewCurrent neurology and neuroscience reports2014

Dreaming and offline memory consolidation.

Erin J Wamsley

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current neurology and neuroscience reports, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The influence of intentions on dream content.Sleep advances : a journal of the Sleep Research Society · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. How our understanding of memory replay evolves.Journal of neurophysiology · 2023
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Erin J WamsleyDepartment of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA, erin.wamsley@furman.edu.

Funding

TRAINING IN SLEEP, CIRCADIAN &RESPIRATORY NEUROBIOLOGYT32HL007901 · NHLBI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI Charles A Czeisler · 1998 to 2026
$18.5M
The evolution of memories across wake and sleepR01MH048832 · NIMH · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (MEDICAL SCHOOL) · PI STICKGOLD, ROBERT · 1993 to 2018
$8.9M
Harvard Clinical and Translational Science Center (KL2)KL2TR000168 · NCATS · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI NADLER, LEE MARSHALL · 2012 to 2013
$965k
EEG Signatures of Offline Memory Reactivation and ConsolidationR21MH098171 · NIMH · BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER · PI STICKGOLD, ROBERT, WAMSLEY, ERIN J · 2013 to 2014
$435k
NCATS NIH HHS 8KL2TR000168-05NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR000168NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL007901NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL07901-10NIMH NIH HHS 1R21MH098171-01A1NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH048832NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH098171
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Converging evidence suggests that dreaming is influenced by the consolidation of memory during sleep. Following encoding, recently formed memory traces are gradually stabilized and reorganized into a more permanent form of long-term storage. Sleep provides an optimal neurophysiological state to facilitate this process, allowing memory networks to be repeatedly reactivated in the absence of new sensory input. The process of memory reactivation and consolidation in the sleeping brain appears to influence conscious experience during sleep, contributing to dream content recalled on awakening. This article outlines several lines of evidence in support of this hypothesis, and responds to some common objections.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrainConsciousnessDreamsEye MovementsHumansMemorySleep

Identifiers

PMID24477388
PMCPMC4704085

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.