Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24477090›Full record

ArticleCPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology2014

Identifying tinnitus-related genes based on a side-effect network analysis.

A B Elgoyhen, B Langguth, W Nowak, M Schecklmann, D De Ridder, S Vanneste

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Tinnitus: Clinical Insights in Its Pathophysiology-A Perspective.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Pharmacotherapy of Tinnitus.Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · 2021
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Tinnitus: perspectives from human neuroimaging.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2015
    Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

A B Elgoyhen1] Instituto de Investigaciones en Ingeniería Genética y Biología Molecular, Dr. Héctor N Torres, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, Buenos Aires, Argentina [2] Departamento de Farmacología, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
B LangguthDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Interdisciplinary Tinnitus Clinic, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
W NowakDepartamento de Farmacología, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
M SchecklmannDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Interdisciplinary Tinnitus Clinic, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
D De RidderDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Unit of Neurosurgery, Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
S VannesteLaboratory for Auditory & Integrative Neuroscience, School of Behavioral and Brain Sciences, University of Texas at Dallas, Dallas, Texas, USA.
University of Regensburg · DEConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas · ARThe University of Texas at Dallas · USUniversity of Buenos Aires · ARUniversity of Otago · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tinnitus, phantom sound perception, is a worldwide highly prevalent disorder for which no clear underlying pathology has been established and for which no approved drug is on the market. Thus, there is an urgent need for new approaches to understand this condition. We used a network pharmacology side-effect analysis to search for genes that are involved in tinnitus generation. We analyzed a network of 1,313 drug-target pairs, based on 275 compounds that elicit tinnitus as side effect and their targets reported in databases, and used a quantitative score to identify emergent significant targets that were more common than expected at random. Cyclooxigenase 1 and 2 were significant, which validates our approach, since salicylate is a known tinnitus generator. More importantly, we predict previously unknown tinnitus-related targets. The present results have important implications toward understanding tinnitus pathophysiology and might pave the way toward the design of novel pharmacotherapies.CPT Pharmacometrics Syst. Pharmacol. (2014) 3, e97; doi:10.1038/psp.2013.75; published online 29 January 2014.

Identifiers

PMID24477090
PMCPMC3910011
OpenAlexW2047487185

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.