Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24476740›Full record

Trial reportStem cell research & therapy2014

Progenitor cell therapy for sacral pressure sore: a pilot study with a novel human chronic wound model.

Reto Wettstein, Miodrag Savic, Gerhard Pierer, Oliver Scheufler, Martin Haug, Jörg Halter, Alois Gratwohl, Michael Baumberger, Dirk Johannes Schaefer, Daniel Felix Kalbermatten

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Stem cell research & therapy, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00535548 (Effect of Hematopoietic Stem Cells in Chronic Wounds Using a Pressure Sore Model), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00535548 phase1unknown statusnot on this map

Effect of Hematopoietic Stem Cells in Chronic Wounds Using a Pressure Sore Model: A Pilot Study on Feasibility, Safety and Potential Effects

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospital, Basel, SwitzerlandRan2007 to 2007ConditionsChronic Wounds, Pressure Sores, Hematopoietic Stem Cells, Wound HealingArmsStem cell therapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The Efficacy of Stem Cells in Wound Healing: A Systematic Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. [Cell therapy and wound repair].Zhonghua shao shang yu chuang mian xiu fu za zhi · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Stem Cells for Cutaneous Wound Healing.BioMed research international · 2015
    Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Reto Wettstein
Miodrag Savic
Gerhard Pierer
Oliver Scheufler
Martin Haug
Jörg Halter
Alois Gratwohl
Michael Baumberger
Dirk Johannes Schaefer
Daniel Felix Kalbermatten
University Hospital of Basel · CHSwiss Paraplegic Center · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionChronic wounds are a major health-care issue, but research is limited by the complexity and heterogeneity in terms of wound etiology as well as patient-related factors. A suitable animal model that replicates the situation in humans is not available. Therefore, the aim of the present work is to present a standardized human wound model and the data of a pilot study of topically applied progenitor cells in a sacral pressure sore.

methodsThree patients underwent cell harvest from the iliac crest at the time of the initial debridement. Forty-eight hours after bone marrow harvest and debridement, the CD34+ selected cell suspension was injected into the wound. With the aid of a laser scanner, three-dimensional analyses of wound morphometry were performed until the defect was reconstructed with a local flap 3 weeks after debridement.

resultsDecreases in volume to 60%±6% of baseline on the sham side and to 52%±3% of baseline on the cell side were measured. Histologic work-up revealed no signs of metaplastic, dysplastic, or neoplastic proliferation/differentiation after progenitor cell treatment. CD34+ cells were detected in the biopsies of day 0.

conclusionsThe pressure sore wound model allows investigation of the initial 3 weeks after cell-based therapy. Objective outcome analysis in terms of wound volume and histology can be performed without, or with, minimal additional morbidity, and the anatomy of the sacral area allows a control and study side in the same patient. Therefore, this model can serve as a standard for wound-healing studies.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT00535548.

Indexed as

Mesenchymal Stem Cell TransplantationAdultHumansMaleMiddle AgedPressure UlcerSacrococcygeal Region

Identifiers

PMID24476740
PMCPMC4054976
OpenAlexW2145365972

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.